Abstract
Canada's changes in juvenile justice legislation have been extensively analyzed in relation to the urbanization, industrialization, and growth in education of the last century. During the last half century, Taiwan has experienced these same structural transformations. Using three models of juvenile justice, this article examines the usefulness of the analysis usually given the Canadian case for understanding changes in Taiwanese juvenile justice legislation. It is concluded that the Canadian analysis is partially, but not fully, adequate for the Taiwanese case. The differences allow further reflection on the experiences of both countries.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
