Abstract

Kant proceeded from our actual experience of pleasure in judgements of taste to describe these judgements. To be valid, aesthetic judgements must be entirely subjective — being based only on a feeling of pleasure or displeasure; must be disinterested — free of determinate concepts, including determinate ends; must be singular — and so seek confirmation through other subjects; must be universal — in being based in ourselves on something we share with others; and are necessary — we can demand others’ agreement. In the process Kant rejects various other conceptions of the ‘aesthetic’ and defends his own claims. For example, he dismisses the sceptical claim that we cannot rely on pleasure as the basis for any validity, by showing that unless our ‘inner experience’ were similar, we could not communicate our objective experience.KeywordsFourth MomentActual InstanceAesthetic JudgementNatural BeautyUniversal ValidityThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.