Abstract
It is a general expectation that those who exercise official power requiring them to make decisions affecting members of our society will act rationally in doing so. There is a question whether consistently with that expectation and the rule of law there is room for decision-making processes which involve elements of an arbitrary nature which cannot be explained by rules of logic. A subset of the large question, which can be posed as a kind of thought experiment, is whether and to what extent official decision-making by the use of random processes such as ballots is supportable?
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
