JP1.4 A biomechanical evaluation of hip joint stability after transverse versus longitudinal capsulotomy: a cadaveric analysis

Biomechanical effect on hip joint stability between the transverse interportal capsulotomy and the longitudinal capsulotomy in arthroscopy has not been fully investigated. To evaluate whether rotational stability and distraction resistance differ between the 2 capsulotomy directions using fresh-frozen cadavers. Controlled laboratory study. Twelve hips of 6 fresh-frozen cadavers, including intact femur and pelvis, were tested in 3 conditions: intact, capsulotomy, and repaired. Two capsulotomy patterns were made: a 4-cm transverse capsular resection based on a transverse interportal capsulotomy, and longitudinal capsulotomy. Six hips were transverse capsulotomy and 6 hips were longitudinal capsulotomy. The pelvis was fixed to a wooden plate, and the intramedullary nail was inserted into the femur. To evaluate rotational stability, internal and external torques of 5 N·m were applied at 15° of hip extension and 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° of hip flexion, respectively. To test for distraction, the specimens were axially loaded from 0- to 150-N distraction forces at different flexion angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°). The external rotation laxity increased significantly after the transverse capsulotomy at all flexion angles and longitudinal capsulotomy only at 0°. The separation distance increased significantly after the transverse and longitudinal capsulotomies. The change in external rotation laxity was significantly greater in transverse capsulotomy at 15° of hip extension and 0° than longitudinal capsulotomies in unrepaired conditions compared with intact conditions. With distraction loads, the transverse capsulotomy resulted in a significantly greater separation distance than the longitudinal capsulotomy at all flexion angles with 100 N, and at 0° and 60° with 50 N. Significant differences were observed after capsular repaired compared with intact for external rotation angle at 15° extension and 0°, and separation distance at 60° flexion with 150 N and 100 N between capsulotomy directions. This cadaveric study demonstrated that the hips with the longitudinal capsulotomy resulted in less external rotation laxity, especially at 15° extension and 0°, and less distraction laxity compared with those with the transverse capsulotomy; and these differences remained after repair of capsulotomy. Either capsulotomy direction is effective if the capsular repair is performed properly because the standard capsular repair improves capsular stability. However, surgeons should note that the longitudinal incision tends to be more stable at lower levels of hip flexion.

After elbow fracture-dislocation, surgeons confront numerous treatment options in pursuing a stable joint for early motion. The relative contributions of the radial head and coronoid, in combination, to elbow stability have not been defined fully. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an approximately 50% transverse coronoid fracture and fixation in the setting of an intact or resected radial head on coronal (varus/valgus) and axial (internal and external rotational) laxity in (1) gravity varus stress; and (2) gravity valgus stress models. Kinematic data were collected on six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities tested with passive motion throughout the flexion arc under varus and valgus gravity stress with lateral collateral ligaments reconstructed. Testing included coronoid fracture and osteosynthesis with and without a radial head. In the varus gravity stress model, fixation of the coronoid improved varus stability (fixed: 1.6° [95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.2], fractured: 5.6° [4.2-7.0], p<0.001) and internal rotational stability (fixed: 1.8° [0.9-2.7], fractured: 5.4° [4.0-6.8], p<0.001), but radial head fixation did not contribute to varus stability (intact head: 2.7° [1.3-4.1], resected head: 3.8° [2.3-5.3], p=0.4) or rotational stability (intact: 2.7° [0.9-4.5], resected head: 3.9° [1.5-6.3], p=0.4). With valgus stress, coronoid fixation improved valgus stability (fixed: 2.1° [1.0-3.1], fractured: 3.8° [1.8-5.8], p<0.04) and external rotation stability (fixed: 0.8° [0.1-1.5], fractured: 2.1° [0.9-3.4], p<0.04), but the radial head played a more important role in providing valgus stability (intact: 1.4° [0.8-2.0], resected head: 7.1° [3.5-10.7], p<0.001). Fixation of a 50% transverse coronoid fracture improves varus and internal rotatory laxity but is unlikely to meaningfully improve valgus or external rotation laxity. The radial head, on the other hand, is a stabilizer to resist valgus stress regardless of the status of the coronoid. Determination as to whether it is necessary to fix a coronoid fracture should be based on the stability of the elbow when tested with a varus load. The elbow may potentially be stable with fractures involving less than 50% of the coronoid. Under all circumstances, the radial head should be fixed or replaced to ensure valgus external rotatory stability.

BackgroundSeveral clinical tests exist to assess knee laxity. Although these assessments are the predominant tools of diagnosis, they are subjective and rely on the experience of the clinician. The robotic knee testing (RKT) device has been developed to quantitatively and objectively measure rotational knee laxity. The purpose of this study was primarily to determine the intra-tester reliability of rotational knee laxity and slack, the amount of rotation occurring between the two turning points of the load deformation curve, measured by the RKT device and investigate the differences between female and male measurements.MethodsNinety-one healthy and moderately active volunteers took part in the study, of which twenty-five participated in the reliability study. Tibial rotation was performed using a servomotor to a torque of 6 N m, while measurements of motion in all 6° of freedom were collected. Reliability measurements were collected over 5 days at similar times of the day. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values and standard error of measurement (SEM) were determined across the load deformation curves. Linear mixed effects modelling was used to further assess the reliability of the measurement of external and internal tibial rotation using features of the curve (internal/external rotational laxity and slack). Measurements of internal/external rotational laxity and slack were compared between the sexes using the Student t test.ResultsPointwise axial rotation measurements of the tibia had good reliability [ICC (2,1) 0.83–0.89], while reliability of the secondary motions ranged between poor and good [ICC (2,1) 0.31–0.89]. All SEMs were less than 0.3°. Most of the variation of the curve features were accounted for by inter-subject differences (56.2–77.8%) and showed moderate to good reliability. Comparison of the right legs of the sexes revealed that females had significantly larger amounts of internal rotation laxity (females 6.1 ± 1.3° vs males 5.6 ± 0.9°, p = 0.037), external rotation laxity (females 6.0 ± 1.6° vs males 5.0 ± 1.2°, p = 0.002) and slack (females 19.2 ± 4.2° vs males 16.6 ± 2.9°, p = 0.003). Similar results were seen within the left legs.ConclusionsOverall, the RKT is a reliable and precise tool to assess the rotational laxity of the knee joint in healthy individuals. Finally, greater amounts of laxity and slack were also reported for females.

Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Effective in Restoring Knee Stability in a Chronic, Complex Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee Model: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

Background Although many posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are in combination with posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries, there has been little research on combined injury reconstruction; the literature includes differing recommendations. Hypothesis Combined PCL plus PLC reconstruction corrects the abnormal posterior translation, varus, and external rotation laxities caused by combined PCL plus PLC deficiency. Furthermore, double-bundle PCL plus PLC reconstruction restores laxity closer to normal than single-bundle PCL plus PLC reconstruction. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Cadaveric knee kinematics were measured electromagnetically in 9 knees with posterior drawer, external rotation, and varus rotation loads applied at sequential stages: intact, PCL-deficient, PCL plus PLC-deficient, double-bundle PCL plus modified Larson PLC reconstruction, and single-bundle PCL plus modified Larson PLC reconstruction. Each graft was tensioned using a laxity-matching protocol. Results There was no significant difference between single-bundle and double-bundle PCL reconstruction, in combination with the modified Larson reconstruction, at any angle of flexion. Both combined reconstructions restored posterior drawer, external rotation, and varus laxity so that they did not differ significantly from normal. Conclusion In combined PCL plus PLC deficiency, combined PCL plus PLC reconstruction restored all major laxity limits to normal across the range of knee flexion examined. Double-bundle PCL reconstruction was not better than single-bundle reconstruction in this context. Clinical Relevance The added complexity of double-bundle reconstruction does not seem to be justified by these results. In combined PCL plus PLC-deficient knees, combined single-bundle PCL plus modified Larson PLC reconstruction was sufficient to restore posterior drawer, external rotation, and varus laxity to normal.

Background Various surgical techniques to treat posterolateral knee instability have been described. To date, the recommended treatment is an anatomical form of reconstruction, in which the 3 key structures of the posterolateral corner are addressed: the lateral collateral ligament, the popliteofibular ligament, and the popliteus tendon. Hypothesis Two methods of surgical reconstruction will restore posterolateral knee instability, in terms of static laxity as well as dynamic 6 degrees of freedom kinematics, to statistically significant levels compared with the intact state. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Two surgical techniques (A and B) were used to reconstruct the posterolateral structures in 10 cadaveric knees. Static tests were performed on the intact, sectioned, and reconstructed knees at 30° and 90° of flexion for anterior-posterior laxity and external rotational laxity, as well as at 0° and 30° of flexion for varus laxity; dynamic 6 degrees of freedom kinematic testing, through a path of motion from 90° of flexion to full extension, was also performed. Results For the static varus tests, external rotation and varus laxity were significantly increased after the posterolateral structures were cut. Both reconstruction techniques restored external rotation and varus laxity to levels not significantly different from the intact state. For technique B, dynamic testing did not show any significant difference for all degrees of freedom kinematics compared with the intact state. However, for technique A, a significant internal tibial rotation was observed throughout the entire path of motion from 0° to 90° of knee flexion. Conclusions Both surgical techniques for anatomical posterolateral corner reconstruction showed good results in the static laxity tests. The anatomical reconstruction of all structures, including the popliteus tendon, resulted in an abnormal internal tibial rotation during dynamic testing.

Is the anterolateral ligament the smoking gun to explain rotational knee laxity or just vaporware?

Although many PCL injuries are in combination with posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries, there has been little work done on combined injury reconstruction; the literature includes differing recommendations. It was hypothesised that a double-bundle PCL reconstruction would restore both posterior drawer and external rotation laxities closer to normal than an isolated single-bundle reconstruction in combined PCL plus PLC-deficient knees. However, it was also hypothesised that an isolated PCL reconstruction would still leave abnormal rotation laxity. In this controlled laboratory study, cadaver knee kinematics were measured electromagnetically with posterior drawer, external rotation, varus rotation loads applied, at sequential stages: intact; PCL-deficient; PCL plus PLC-deficient; double-bundle PCL reconstruction; single-bundle PCL reconstruction. The grafts were tensed using a posterior drawer laxity matching protocol. There was no significant difference between single- and double-bundle PCL reconstructions at any angle of flexion: both reconstructions restored posterior drawer to normal; neither reconstruction restored external rotation or varus laxity to normal. We concluded that, in combined PCL plus PLC deficiency, isolated PCL reconstruction only controls tibial posterior drawer, but is not sufficient to restore rotational laxity to normal. Double-bundle PCL reconstruction was not better than single-bundle, so the added complexity of double-bundle reconstruction does not seem to be justified by these results.

While the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is considered one of the most important ligaments for providing knee joint stability, its influence on rotational laxity is not fully understood and its role in resisting rotation at different flexion angles in vivo remains unknown. In this prospective study, we investigated the relationship between in vivo passive axial rotational laxity and knee flexion angle, as well as how they were altered with ACL injury and reconstruction. A rotometer device was developed to assess knee joint rotational laxity under controlled passive testing. An axial torque of ±2.5Nm was applied to the knee while synchronised fluoroscopic images of the tibia and femur allowed axial rotation of the bones to be accurately determined. Passive rotational laxity tests were completed in 9 patients with an untreated ACL injury and compared to measurements at 3 and 12 months after anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction, as well as to the contralateral controls. Significant differences in rotational laxity were found between the injured and the healthy contralateral knees with internal rotation values of 8.7°±4.0° and 3.7°±1.4° (p = 0.003) at 30° of flexion and 9.3°±2.6° and 4.0°±2.0° (p = 0.001) at 90° respectively. After 3 months, the rotational laxity remained similar to the injured condition, and significantly different to the healthy knees. However, after 12 months, a considerable reduction of rotational laxity was observed towards the levels of the contralateral controls. The significantly greater laxity observed at both knee flexion angles after 3 months (but not at 12 months), suggests an initial lack of post-operative rotational stability, possibly due to reduced mechanical properties or fixation stability of the graft tissue. After 12 months, reduced levels of rotational laxity compared with the injured and 3 month conditions, both internally and externally, suggests progressive rotational stability of the reconstruction with time.

PurposeThe aim of the current study was to objectify the rotational laxity after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and rerupture after ACL reconstruction by instrumented measurement. It was hypothesized that knees with recurrent instability feature a higher internal rotation laxity as compared to knees with a primary rupture of the native ACL.Study designCross-sectional study, Level of evidence III.MethodsIn a clinical cross-sectional study successive patients with primary ACL rupture and rerupture after ACL reconstruction were evaluated clinically and by instrumented measurement of the rotational and antero-posterior laxity with a validated instrument and the KT1000®, respectively. Clinical examination comprised IKDC 2000 forms, Lysholm Score, and Tegner Activity Scale. Power calculation and statistical analysis were performed (p value < 0.05).Results24 patients with primary ACL rupture and 23 patients with ACL rerupture were included. There was no significant side-to-side difference in anterior translation. A side-to side difference of internal rotational laxity ≥ 10° was found significantly more frequent in reruptures (53.6%) compared to primary ruptures (19.4%; p < 0.001). A highly significant relationship between the extent of the pivot-shift phenomenon and side-to-side difference of internal rotation laxity could be demonstrated (p < 0.001). IKDC 2000 subjective revealed significantly better scores in patients with primary ACL tear compared to patients with ACL rerupture (56.4 ± 7.8 vs. 50.8 ± 6.2; p = 0.01). Patients with primary ACL tears scored significantly better on the Tegner Activity Scale (p = 0.02). No significant differences were seen in the Lysholm Score (p = 0.78).ConclusionPatients with ACL rerupture feature significantly higher internal rotation laxity of the knee compared to primary ACL rupture. The extend of rotational laxity can be quantified by instrumented measurements. This can be valuable data for the indication of an anterolateral ligament reconstruction in ACL revision surgery.

Background: Excessive physiological anterior and rotational knee laxity is thought to be a risk factor for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and inferior reconstruction outcomes, but no thresholds have been established to identify patients with increased laxity. Purpose: (1) To determine if the healthy contralateral knees of ACL-injured patients have greater anterior and rotational knee laxity, leading to different laxity profiles (combination of laxities), compared with healthy control knees and (2) to set a threshold to help discriminate anterior and rotational knee laxity between these groups. Study Design: Case-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 171 healthy contralateral knees of noncontact ACL-injured patients (ACL-H group) and 104 healthy knees of control participants (CTL group) were tested for anterior and rotational laxity. Laxity scores (measurements corrected for sex and body mass) were used to classify knees as hypolax (score <–1), normolax (between −1 and 1), or hyperlax (>1). Proportions of patients in each group were compared using χ2 tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were computed to discriminate laxity between the groups. Odds ratios were calculated to determine the probability of being in the ACL-H group. Results: The ACL-H group displayed greater laxity scores for anterior displacement and internal rotation in their uninjured knee compared with the CTL group (P < .05). Laxity profiles were different between the groups for the following associations: normolax in anterior displacement/hypolax in internal rotation (6% [ACL-H] vs 15% [CTL]; P = .02) and hyperlax in anterior displacement/normolax in internal rotation (27% [ACL-H] vs 10% [CTL]; P < .01). The laxity score thresholds were 0.75 for anterior laxity and −0.55 for internal rotation. With both scores above these thresholds, a patient was 3.18-fold more likely to be in the ACL-H group (95% CI, 1.74-5.83). Conclusion: The healthy contralateral knees of patients with noncontact ACL injuries display different laxity values both for internal rotation and anterior displacement compared with healthy control knees. The identification of knee laxity profiles may be of relevance for primary and secondary prevention programs of noncontact ACL injuries.

Background: While single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces anterior-posterior laxity, studies have demonstrated residual rotational instability. Improved pivot-shift results have been shown with the double-bundle graft; however, no study has compared rotational laxity outcome of these surgical techniques in vivo under quantified, isolated torsional loading. Hypothesis: The anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knee exhibits greater rotational laxity than the contralateral uninjured knee. The double-bundle reconstruction restores rotational joint stability to a greater extent than single-bundle surgery. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Rotational laxity of 32 patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury was assessed in both knees at full extension and 30° of flexion using a magnetic resonance imaging–compatible torsional loading device. Patients were randomly allocated either a single- or double-bundle reconstruction and reassessed 5 months after surgery. Results: The anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knees demonstrated greater laxity to internal rotational torque in the extended position, but not in the 30° flexed position. No significant differences in rotational laxity were found between single- and double-bundle reconstructions. In extension, excessive internal rotational laxity of injured compared with contralateral knees was reduced by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The single-bundle reconstruction did not affect internal rotation compared with contralateral or preoperative groups. In response to internal rotational torque in the flexed knee position, the double-bundle reconstruction reduced laxity to 10.8° from the pre-operative value of 15.3° (P = .058); postoperative rotation was also significantly less than the contralateral laxity of 16.4° (P = .022). Conclusion: The ruptured anterior cruciate ligament resulted in increased internal rotational laxity only in the extended position. The single-bundle reconstruction did not affect rotational restraint compared with contralateral or preoperative groups. The double-bundle procedure significantly reduced internal laxity in the flexed position when compared with normal. Clinical Relevance: As the anterior cruciate ligament is not the primary restraint to rotation, its contribution to joint stability is limited under isolated torsional load. While the double-bundle graft demonstrates superior rotational constraint, this may be excessive for isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Throwing arm injuries are common and often related to shoulder rotational laxity. Both shoulder external and internal rotational laxity are often checked in a physical assessment. The shoulder external rotation of the throwing arm during physical assessment is reported to be about 10 degree greater than the non-throwing arm [1]. Throwing arm injuries often occur during throwing activities. High forces and torques were generated during throwing activity. Extremely high shoulder external rotation (about 180°) and high internal rotation velocity (over 7000°/s) during baseball pitching are reported [2].

Background:Biomechanical studies have shown excellent anteroposterior and rotatorylaxity control after double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)reconstruction, but no clinical studies have compared midterm (>5-year)residual laxity between the DB and single-bundle (SB) techniques.Purpose:To clinically compare sagittal and rotatory laxities and residual sagittallaxity on the KT-1000 arthrometer between patients treated with an SB ACLreconstruction and those treated with a DB ACL reconstruction at the 7-yearfollow-up.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 110 patients were included between January 2006 and December 2007.The patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: those treated with SB ACLreconstruction (n = 63) and those treated with the DB technique (n = 47).All patients were then reviewed at a minimum of 7 years of follow-up;patients with ACL rerupture (n = 3 in the SB group and n = 2 in the DBgroup) were excluded from the postoperative comparative analysis. Residualanterior laxity (Lachman test), rotatory laxity (pivot-shift test), andsagittal laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference) were measuredand compared between the 2 groups.Results:The mean age at surgery was 23.0 ± 5.1 years for the DB group and 28.1 ± 7.0years for the SB group, and the mean follow-up was 7.4 ± 0.8 years. Nostatistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups interms of age, sex, preoperative laxity on KT-1000, preoperative Tegnerscore, or concomitant meniscal lesions. Residual postoperative laxity viaLachman testing (P < .01), pivot-shift testing(P = .042), and the KT-1000 arthrometer(P < .01) was statistically significantly in favorof DB reconstruction.Conclusion:DB ACL reconstruction allowed better control of anterior stability during theevaluation via the Lachman test and via objective measurement on theKT-1000, as well as rotatory stability at a minimum of 7 years offollow-up.

The effects of biceps tendon tenodesis on internal-external and varus-valgus laxity were measured using fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens that had undergone sequential sectioning of the posterolateral structures and of the fibular collateral ligament. Tenodesis (using 89 N graft tension and a fixation point located 1 cm anterior to the fibular collateral ligament's insertion on the femur) was effective in restoring external rotation and varus laxity; the procedure actually overconstrained external tibial rotation at all flexion positions and varus angulation at 60 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion. Internal rotation and valgus laxity were unaffected by the tenodesis procedure. The anterior fixation point was more effective in reducing laxity than a fixation point located 1 cm proximal to the fibular collateral ligament insertion. Tenodesis using the proximal fixation point, which was nonisometric, did not restore external rotation and varus laxities to intact values at 60 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion. Graft tension (45 or 89 N) had no measurable effect on the results of the tenodesis. This study has demonstrated that the biceps tenodesis procedure is effective for reducing static laxity in the knee with posterolateral instability.