Abstract

In the ABSORB study cohort A the changes in the amount of dense calcium and necrotic core have not been reported in comparison to the prestenting phase; this evaluation could be useful to better clarify the bioabsorption process. Aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the dynamic changes in plaque size and plaque tissue composition observed between 6 months and 2 years follow-up, and to compare these findings to the prestenting phase. Angiography, intravascular ultrasound and derived parameters (virtual histology, palpography, and echogenicity) were serially assessed postprocedure, at 6 months and at 2 years in 20 patients. In a subset of 8 patients the same measurements were also recorded in the prestenting phase. In the total population a reduction of 18% in the plaque area was observed between 6 month and 2 year follow-up (7.56 +/- 2.32 mm2 at 6 months vs. 6.16 +/- 2.10 mm2 at 2 year follow-up; P < 0.01). In the subgroup of eight patients who underwent IVUS during the pre-stenting phase, the plaque area at 2 year follow-up was not significantly different when compared to the prestenting plaque area (7.29 +/- 2.29 mm2 at prestenting vs. 7.48 +/- 1.45 mm2 at 2 year follow-up, P = NS). Necrotic core area was reduced by 24% between the 6 month and 2 year follow-up (0.97 +/- 0.66 mm2 at 6 months vs. 0.74 +/- 0.53 mm2 at 2 year follow-up; P = NS), whilst dense calcium was reduced by 14% from 6 month to 2 year follow-up (0.83 +/- 0.50 mm2 at 6 months vs 0.72 +/- 0.64 mm2 at 2 year follow-up; P = NS). Whilst the necrotic core at 2 years follow-up was not significantly different when compared to the pre-stenting phase (0.62 +/- 0.42 mm2 prestenting vs 1.07 +/- 0.56 mm2 at 2 year follow-up; P = NS), the area of dense calcium was significantly higher at follow-up compared to prestenting (0.35 +/- 0.35 mm2 pre-stenting vs. 0.84 +/- 0.66 mm2 at 2 year follow-up; P < 0.05). The reduction in the necrotic core component between 6 month and two year follow-up could be related to a synergistic effect of the bio-absorption process and the anti-inflammatory action of everolimus.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.