Ivarmacitinib ointment for the treatment of adults with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: phase 3 part of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 clinical trial.

Introduction/Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease with onset usually occurring in childhood. Topical therapy is the mainstay of AD treatment and is typically used prior to systemic therapy in patients with moderate disease. Ruxolitinib (Janus kinase [JAK] 1/JAK2 inhibitor) cream is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients aged ≥12 years with mild to moderate AD, and has demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated in children (aged 2–11 y) with AD in TRuE-AD3 (NCT04921969), a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study. Objectives Here we investigated the effects of ruxolitinib cream in a subset of patients from TRuE-AD3 with moderate and/or more extensive disease at baseline. Methods TRuE-AD3 included children aged 2–11 years with AD for ≥3 months, an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 2 or 3, and an affected body surface area (BSA) of 3%–20%. Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to apply 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, 0.75% ruxolitinib cream, or vehicle cream twice daily for 8 weeks. Rescue treatment was not permitted. Patients from TRuE-AD3 with moderate and/or more extensive disease at baseline (defined as an IGA score of 3, ≥10% affected BSA, or a combined IGA score of 3 and ≥10% BSA) were included in this analysis. Efficacy was assessed as the proportion of patients in each treatment group who achieved IGA treatment success (IGA-TS; a score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline), ≥75% improvement from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), and ≥90% improvement from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8. Statistical significance was assessed at Week 8 using exact logistic regression. Patients with missing post-baseline data were imputed as nonresponders. Results Patients in TRuE-AD3 (N=330) had a median (range) age of 6 (2–11) years, 54.2% were girls, and 54.5% were White. The mean (SD) BSA was 10.5% (5.4%), the mean (SD) EASI was 8.6 (5.4), and 252 patients (76.4%) had a baseline IGA of 3. Among patients with an IGA of 3 at baseline, more patients who applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or 0.75% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle achieved IGA-TS (40.0% and 29.1%, respectively, vs 6.1%), EASI-75 (43.0% and 38.8% vs 8.2%), and EASI-90 (17.0% and 21.4% vs 0%) at Week 2. Improvements were also observed at Week 8 (IGA-TS, 59.0% [P<0.0001] and 37.9% [P=0.004] vs 14.3%; EASI-75, 64.0% [P<0.0001] and 48.5% [P<0.0001] vs 14.3%; EASI-90, 40.0% [P<0.0001] and 33.0% [P=0.001] vs 8.2%), with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream consistently resulting in numerically better improvements than 0.75% ruxolitinib cream. Similar improvements were observed with ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle among patients with ≥10% affected BSA at baseline and a combined baseline IGA of 3 and ≥10% BSA. Both strengths of ruxolitinib cream were well tolerated among patients with an IGA of 3 at baseline; no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported. Conclusions Children with moderate and/or more extensive AD in this study had substantially higher rates of clinical responses with ruxolitinib cream monotherapy versus vehicle as early as Week 2 (first assessment), with further improvement throughout the 8-week treatment period. Ruxolitinib cream was well tolerated with no serious TEAEs.

The relapsing nature of atopic dermatitis (AD) presents a challenge for its long-term treatment. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids have been proven in the acute treatment of active AD, but their long-term efficacy and potential to reduce or prevent relapses have only partially been addressed. To investigate long-term management (16 weeks) of AD with methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA) 0.1% cream twice weekly in addition to an emollient (Advabase((R))) after stabilization of an acute severe or very severe flare of AD with MPA cream. Patients > or = 12 years of age with a > or = 2-year history of moderate to severe AD were eligible for this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled study if they presented with an acute flare of severe or very severe AD [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score > or = 4]. After successful treatment of the flare in an acute phase (AP), patients received either MPA twice weekly plus emollient or emollient alone over a 16-week maintenance phase (MP). The primary study endpoint was time to relapse of AD. Secondary endpoints included relapse rate and disease status, the patient's assessment of intensity of itch, the Eczema Area and Severity Index, the IGA score, affected body surface area, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and children's DLQI (CDLQI), patient's and investigator's global assessment of response and patient's assessment of quality of sleep. Two hundred and forty-nine patients entered the AP and 221 continued into the MP. Time to relapse was longer in the MPA group than in the emollient group. The probability of remaining free from relapse after 16 weeks was 87.1% in the MPA group compared with 65.8% for the emollient. Patients treated with MPA twice weekly had a 3.5-fold lower risk of experiencing a relapse than patients treated with emollient alone (hazard ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.9-6.4; P < 0.0001). MPA was also superior to emollient for all other efficacy endpoints. Therapy with both treatments was well tolerated. MPA twice weekly plus an emollient provides an effective maintenance treatment regimen to control AD. Once stabilized, treatment with MPA significantly reduces the risk of relapse and the intensity of itching, and improves the overall patient status.

Tapinarof is a nonsteroidal, topical, aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in Japanese patients aged ≥12 years. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tapinarof in Japanese pediatric patients aged 2 to 11 years with AD in a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial. Eligible patients (N = 121) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive tapinarof cream 0.5%, tapinarof cream 1%, or vehicle cream once daily for 8 weeks. At week 8, the least-squares mean percent change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score (the primary endpoint) was -81.29% in the tapinarof 0.5% group, -77.62% in the tapinarof 1% group, and - 18.56% in the vehicle group. Reductions in EASI score at week 8 were significantly greater in the tapinarof groups than in the vehicle group (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). The proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement from baseline in EASI score at week 8 was 77.5% in the tapinarof 0.5% group, 70.7% in the tapinarof 1% group, and 15.0% in the vehicle group. The proportion of patients who achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at week 8 was 32.5% in the tapinarof 0.5% group, 43.9% in the tapinarof 1% group, and 17.5% in the vehicle group. No treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) were reported; all of the AEs were mild or moderate. Common AEs in tapinarof-treated patients included gastroenteritis, application site irritation, and nasopharyngitis. The incidence of trial discontinuations due to AEs was low in tapinarof-treated patients (one patient for each strength). In summary, both strengths of tapinarof cream demonstrated greater efficacy than vehicle cream and were well tolerated in Japanese pediatric patients with AD.

One-year real-world clinical effectiveness, safety, and laboratory safety of dupilumab in Japanese adult patients with atopic dermatitis: A single-center retrospective study

SummaryBackgroundIn the U.S.A., an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of ≤ 1 (clear or almost clear skin) has been the standard measure in regulatory outcomes for registration clinical trials in atopic dermatitis (AD), including those supporting the recent approval of dupilumab.ObjectivesTo evaluate the treatment effect of dupilumab in patients with IGA > 1 at the end of treatment, using other validated outcome measures for AD signs, symptoms and quality of life.MethodsLIBERTY AD SOLO 1 and 2 were two 16‐week, randomized, double‐blind trials enrolling adult patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD (IGA ≥ 3) inadequately controlled with topical treatment. We performed a post hoc analysis in patients receiving dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) or placebo. Outcome measures in patients with IGA > 1 included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS), affected body surface area (BSA), Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The trials were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02277743 and NCT02277769.ResultsAt week 16, 278 of 449 dupilumab q2w‐treated patients (median age 36·0 years) and 396 of 443 placebo‐treated patients had IGA > 1. Among patients with IGA > 1 at week 16, dupilumab significantly improved several outcome measures compared with placebo: EASI (−48·9% vs. −11·3%, P < 0·001), pruritus NRS (−35·2% vs. −9·1%, P < 0·001), affected BSA (−23·1% vs. −4·5%, P < 0·001), POEM score ≥ 4‐point improvement (57·4% vs. 21·0%, P < 0·001) and DLQI score ≥ 4‐point improvement (59·3% vs. 24·4%, P < 0·001).ConclusionsIn patients with IGA > 1 at week 16, dupilumab induced statistically significant benefits in multiple validated outcome measures compared with placebo. The IGA ≤ 1 end point significantly underestimates clinically relevant dupilumab treatment effects.

Introduction While clinical trial data demonstrates the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) for atopic dermatitis (AD), long-term real-world evidence remains limited. Objectives Our study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of UPA for AD at week 52±6. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of 3 practices in Canada. Effectiveness endpoints were evaluated at weeks 52±6 and including the following: Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of clear or almost clear (IGA 0/1) as well as improvements in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), body surface area (BSA), IGAxBSA, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)/Children’s DLQI (CDLQI). Safety was determined via incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results A total of 102 patients with AD were included in the analysis; mean age was 44.2 (range: 12-79) years and 52.9% (54/102) were female. Initial UPA doses were 15 mg (UPA15: 41.2%, 42/102) or 30 mg (UPA30: 58.8%, 60/102) once daily. Previous systemic therapies included conventional non-biologics (72.5%), biologics (30.4%), and JAKi (2.9%). At week 52±6: 78.4% (80/102) of patients achieved Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1; 87.5% (49/56), 78.6% (44/56), and 50.0% (28/56) achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvements of 75% (EASI75), 90% (EASI90), and 100% (EASI100), respectively; 75.0% (42/56) achieved EASI90 + IGA 0/1; mean EASI was reduced from 12.9 to 0.8 (mean EASI improvement = 91.4%); 91.9% (52/56), 92.9% (52/56), 82.1% (46/56), and 75.0% (42/56) achieved absolute EASI scores &amp;lt;7, &amp;lt;5, &amp;lt;3, and &amp;lt;1, respectively; mean body surface area (BSA) was reduced from 17.0% to 0.6% (mean BSA improvement=87.8%); mean IGAxBSA was reduced from 52.1 to 0.8 (mean IGAxBSA improvement=90.7%); and mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)/Children’s DLQI was reduced from 13 to 1.8 (mean DLQI/CDLQI improvement=86%), with 66.0% (33/50) of patients achieving DLQI/CDLQI 0/1. For patients not achieving IGA 0/1, EASI75, EASI90, and EASI100 at weeks 8-20, these responses were subsequently achieved in 60.0% (6/10), 88.9% (8/9), 84.6% (11/13), and 38.1% (8/21) of patients at week 52±6. Dose alterations occurred in 13 patients (12.7%) (escalation: 6.9%, 7/102; reduction: 5.9%, 6/102). Concomitant systemic therapies were used in 1.0% (1/102) of patients. We noted higher statistically significant achievement of endpoints for systemic biologic/JAKi-naïve vs -experienced patients (EASI75; EASI&amp;lt;7; EASI&amp;lt;5; DLQI/CDLQI &amp;gt;4-point improvement). No significant differences in outcomes were identified between dosing regimens. Frequent AEs included: acne (19.6%, 20/102), hypertriglyceridemia (17.6%, 18/102), elevated creatine phosphokinase (13.7%, 14/102), neutropenia (7.8%, 8/102), and transaminitis (7.8%, 8/102). Seven patients (6.8%) discontinued UPA owing to treatment-related AEs, including one case of venous thromboembolism; four patients (3.9%) discontinued UPA due to patient preference, and one patient (1%) discontinued UPA due to lack of efficacy. No serious infections, tuberculosis, major adverse cardiovascular events, gastrointestinal perforation, malignancy, or deaths were observed in 102.5 patient-years of follow-up. Conclusions In contrast to 52-week data from the Measure Up 1/2 and AD Up clinical trials, our results were superior for several outcome parameters (IGA 0/1, EASI90, EASI100, and DLQI 0/1), possibly owing to a patient population with less extensive baseline disease severity. Additionally, we noted similar achievement of these endpoints versus comparable long-term real-world studies. Safety was consistent with existing data, highlighting acne as a common AE (5.3%-20.3% versus 19.6%). Study limitations include its sample size and retrospective nature.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is a chronically relapsing, common inflammatory skin disease, which significantly affects quality of life negatively in many respects. Topical steroids are the mainstay of atopic dermatitis treatment but they carry the risk of local side effects. A topical formulation of tacrolimus, a macrolide calcineurin inhibitor, has recently been developed.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.03% tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in Korea.METHODS: An open, non‐comparative, multi‐center study with 4 weeks' follow‐up was performed. A total of 180 patients (aged 2–57 years old) were enrolled. Tacrolimus ointment (0.03%) was applied to all involved areas twice daily. Efficacy was evaluated by an investigator's global assessment, the eczema area and severity index score, and by the patient's assessment of pruritus and clinical response at baseline, and after weeks 1, 2 and 4. Dermatology life quality index (DLQI), children's DLQI (CDLQI) and toddler's DLQI were assessed at baseline and at week 4. The safety assessment included monitoring all adverse events and clinical laboratory values.RESULTS: All efficacy parameters were improved. The mean EASI (eczema area and severity index) score was 19.7 at baseline and reduced to 8.0 at the end of the study. Moderate improvement was observed by the investigator's global assessment after 4 weeks' treatment. A marked decrease of pruritus was observed, and mild or moderate improvement was observed by patients' global assessments after the treatment period. Significant benefits in terms of quality of life in adults and children with atopic dermatitis were obtained. The most common adverse events associated with tacrolimus treatment were transient skin burning sensation (45.3%) and pruritus (41.6%) at the site of application.CONCLUSION: 0.03% tacrolimus ointment should be considered effective and safe in both Korean children and adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

27482 Efficacy of ruxolitinib cream among patients with atopic dermatitis based on previous medication history: Pooled results from two phase 3 studies

Background Eight-week safety and tolerability, efficacy, and limited systemic absorption of ruxolitinib cream 1.5% in an open-label, single-arm, maximum-use trial (MUsT) of children with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD; NCT05034822) were previously described. This is the first report of longer-term data from the same study. Objectives Data on tolerability, safety, systemic exposure, and clinical and patient-reported outcomes are presented from the entire 52-week treatment period to assess whether clinical benefits and tolerability observed through Week 8 are sustained during the as-needed treatment long-term safety period through Week 52. Methods In this open-label, single-arm MUsT, patients 2-11 years old with AD ≥3 months, ≥35% affected body surface area (BSA), and Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) ≥3 applied twice-daily ruxolitinib cream 1.5% for 4 weeks to baseline lesions, then as-needed to active lesions for 4 weeks; patients could continue into the as-needed 44-week long-term safety period. Results This MUsT included 29 patients with moderate to severe AD. Treatment-emergent adverse events through Week 52 occurred in 31.0% of patients. One patient (3.4%) had 2 treatment-related application site reactions (paresthesia and folliculitis); no adverse events resulted in treatment interruption/discontinuation; none were serious or suggested systemic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition. Through the 4-week continuous-use twice-daily treatment period, the mean (SD) application quantity was 8.5 (6.29) g/day, which was associated with a mean steady-state ruxolitinib plasma concentration of 98.2 nM, well below half-maximal concentration of JAK–mediated myelosuppression in adults (281 nM). From Week 8 to Week 52 (as-needed use), mean (SD) application quantity was 3.2 (2.79) g/day, consistent with lower, as-needed use in this long-term safety period. At Weeks 4 and 52 (assessed in n=26 and n=13 patients, respectively), 53.8%/53.8% achieved IGA–Treatment Success (IGA 0/1 with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline). Mean BSA decreased from 58.0% (range, 35.0%–92.0%) at baseline (n=29) to 11.4% at Week 4 and continued to decrease to 2.2% through Week 52 (n=26 and n=14, respectively). Patient-reported outcomes, such as the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index, and Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index, were collected through Week 52. Conclusions Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% demonstrated consistently good tolerability and safety over 52 weeks in children aged 2 to 11 years with extensive moderate to severe AD. Rapid lesion clearance over 4 weeks with twice-daily therapy, which was sustained with longer-term as-needed use associated with low quantities of ruxolitinib cream being applied, may address application burden concerns.

Topical glucocorticosteroids are the gold standard in treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Recently, topical calcineurin inhibitors have been developed for treatment of this condition. This study compared efficacy and safety of 0.1% methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA) ointment with 0.03% tacrolimus ointment for 3 weeks, in children and adolescents with severe to very severe flare of AD. The primary end point was treatment success, defined as a score of 'clear' or 'almost clear' in the static Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score. Secondary end points were the percentage change in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and patients' assessment of itch and sleep, Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index, patient's assessment of global response, affected Body Surface Area and medication costs. 265 patients were randomized to either MPA (n = 129) or tacrolimus (n = 136) treatment, 257 patients completed the study. Methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% ointment once daily provided rapid and relevant clinical benefit. Tacrolimus 0.03% ointment twice daily was equally effective with regard to success rate. Methylprednisolone aceponate was superior to tacrolimus for EASI, itch and sleep. Both treatments were well tolerated. Drug-related adverse events were only observed in the tacrolimus group. Medication costs were significantly lower for MPA. While both treatment groups showed similar efficacy results regarding treatment success (IGA), significant advantages were observed for EASI, itch and sleep with MPA 0.1%. These advantages and the significantly lower treatment costs highlight the benefits of MPA treatment, underlining its first-line role in treatment of children and adolescents with severe AD.

Investigator's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear skin (IGA 0/1) is a difficult endpoint to achieve after short-term treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, and does not fully reflect clinically meaningful changes in other parameters. We assessed the impact of tralokinumab versus placebo on other clinically meaningful parameters in patients not achieving IGA 0/1 at week 16 using pooled data from two monotherapy phase III trials, ECZTRA 1 and 2. This post hoc analysis included patients (n = 1328) from ECZTRA 1 and 2 who did not achieve the co-primary endpoint, IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication. Endpoints evaluating atopic dermatitis extent and severity included proportions of patients achieving IGA 0/1, 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50/75/90); endpoints evaluating patient-reported outcomes included a ≥3-point improvement in worst daily pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), a ≥3-point improvement in eczema-related sleep interference (sleep) NRS, a ≥4-point improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and DLQI ≤5. Specifically, clinically meaningful responses were defined as EASI-50, a ≥3-point improvement in itch NRS, or a ≥ 4-point improvement in DLQI at week 16. Among ECZTRA 1 and 2 patients who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving tralokinumab versus placebo achieved EASI-50 (33.0% vs 13.0%), a ≥ 3-point improvement in itch NRS (22.6% vs 9.4%), or a ≥4-point improvement in DLQI (41.2% vs 24.5%) at week 16. In addition, compared with placebo, a numerically greater proportion of tralokinumab-treated patients achieved all three measures of clinically meaningful response (30% vs 18%) or a clinically meaningful change in at least one outcome (48.8% vs 28.5%). Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving tralokinumab versus placebo achieved additional clinician-reported and patient-reported outcomes, such as EASI-75 (13.5% vs 4.1%), EASI-90 (3.5% vs 1.1%), DLQI ≤5 (22.5% vs 12.5%), and a ≥3-point improvement in sleep NRS (24.5% vs 11.5%). Tralokinumab provided clinically meaningful responses in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 and/or used rescue medication. Using multiple validated outcome measures of both efficacy and quality of life, alongside IGA scores, can better characterize tralokinumab treatment responses in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. [Video abstract available] CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03131648 (ECZTRA 1); study start date: 30 May, 2017; primary completion date: 7 August, 2018; study completion date: 10 October, 2019. NCT03160885 (ECZTRA 2); study start date: 12 June, 2017; primary completion date: 4 September, 2019; study completion date: 14 August, 2019. Video abstract: Tralokinumab provides clinically meaningful responses at week 16 in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who do not achieve IGA 0/1 (MP4 362818 KB).

Introduction Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral, selective Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi), is approved for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). While its efficacy and safety are supported by clinical trial data1-3, real-world evidence is limited. Objectives Our study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of UPA for AD between weeks 8-20. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective review at three practices in Canada. Effectiveness endpoints measured between weeks 8-20 included: Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of clear or almost clear (IGA 0/1) and improvements in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), body surface area (BSA), IGAxBSA, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)/Children’s DLQI (CDLQI) improvements. Safety was assessed via treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results A total of 179 patients were included in the analysis. . The mean age was 44.6 ± 17.5 (range: 12-79) years; 53.6% (96/179) were female. Previous treatments included: topicals (100%, 179/179), light (29.1%, 52/179), systemic non-biologics (74.9%, 134/179), and systemic biologics/JAKi (37.4%, 67/179). Initial UPA doses were 15 mg (44.7%, 80/179) or 30 mg (55.3%, 99/179) once daily. At weeks 8-20: 87.2% (156/179) of patients achieved IGA 0/1; 83.3% (85/102), 74.5% (76/102), and 57.8% (59/102) of patients achieved EASI improvements from baseline of 75% (EASI75), 90% (EASI90), and 100% (EASI100), respectively; mean EASI was reduced from 13.4 to 1.0 (p=0.0001; mean EASI improvement = 88.5%); 98% (100/102), 96.1% (98/102), 88.2% (90/102), and 70.6% (72/102) of patients achieved absolute EASI scores &amp;lt;7, &amp;lt;5, &amp;lt;3, and &amp;lt;1, respectively; mean BSA was reduced from 18.2% to 1.1% (p=0.0001; mean BSA improvement=92.2%); mean IGAxBSA was reduced from 60.9 to 2.1 (p=0.0001; mean IGAxBSA improvement=94.7%); and mean DLQI/CDLQI was reduced from 13.6 to 1.4 (p=0.0001; mean DLQI/CDLQI improvement=87.1%), with 75.9% (63/83) of patients achieving DLQI/CDLQI 0/1. UPA monotherapy was utilized in 39.7% (71/179) of cases. Common concomitant therapies included topical corticosteroids (55.3%, 99/179), topical calcineurin inhibitors (6.7%, 12/179), and intramuscular triamcinolone acetonide (2.2%, 4/179). Statistically significantly higher achievement of endpoints was noted for patients using concomitant therapies (EASI75; EASI90; EASI&amp;lt;1) and systemic biologic/JAKi-naïve patients (EASI75; EASI&amp;lt;5; IGA 0/1; DLQI/CDLQI &amp;gt;4-point improvement). Outcomes were not significantly different between dosing regimens. Frequent AEs included: acne (16.2%, 29/179), hypertriglyceridemia (14%, 25/179), elevated creatinine phosphokinase (10.1%, 18/179), herpes simplex virus (6.7%, 12/179), and transaminitis (4.5%, 8/179). Three patients (1.7%) discontinued treatment (myalgia/arthralgia [n=2]; gastrointestinal discomfort [n=1]). No serious infections, tuberculosis, venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, gastrointestinal perforation, or malignancy were observed in 44.7 patient-years of safety follow-up for the treatment period being analyzed. Conclusions Our study included 75.4% (135/179) of patients with follow-up at weeks ≥12 to ≤16. Interestingly, we found more favourable results than Measure Up 1/2 and AD Up clinical trials at week 16 for IGA 0/1, EASI75, EASI90, EASI100, and DLQI 0/1, likely owing to a patient population with less extensive baseline disease severity, while the safety profile was commensurate. Additionally, we noted higher achievement of IGA 0/1, EASI75, and EASI90 endpoints versus similar real-world studies. Study limitations include its retrospective nature and short follow-up duration. Nonetheless, our results support clinical trial findings suggesting UPA is effective and safe for AD.

Effectiveness and tolerance of Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of recalcitrant atopic dermatitis in a real-life French multicenter adult cohort

311 Effects of ruxolitinib cream in patients with atopic dermatitis with head and/or neck involvement

Standard therapy for patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) typically includes topical therapies; however, patients with more extensive AD and/or AD refractory to topical therapy may benefit from systemic treatment. Ruxolitinib cream monotherapy has demonstrated superior antipruritic and anti-inflammatory effects versus vehicle in patients with mild to moderate AD, and long-term disease control with as-needed use. Here, efficacy/safety of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream through 52weeks was assessed in a subset of patients with moderate and/or more extensive disease. This post hoc analysis of TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2 included patients who, at baseline, had Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 16, and affected body surface area (BSA) ≥ 10% (higher severity of disease threshold subgroup). Disease control and safety were assessed. Of 1249 patients in the overall population, 78 (6.2%) met all higher severity of disease threshold criteria (continuous-use vehicle-controlled period: 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, n = 32; vehicle, n = 13); 28 and 4 of these patients, respectively, continued as-needed 1.5% ruxolitinib cream during the long-term safety (LTS) period. At week8 (continuous-use), IGA-treatment success (IGA0/1, with ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline) was achieved by 19/32 (59.4%) patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus no patients applying vehicle. In the LTS period, those achieving clear/almost clear skin increased from 19/28 patients (67.9%; continuous-use: week8) to 18/23 patients (78.3%; as-needed use: week52) in patients applying ruxolitinib cream from day1. Ruxolitinib cream was well tolerated, with few application site reactions, regardless of disease severity threshold. Efficacy and safety results were similar to the overall study population. Patients with AD who meet standard disease severity eligibility criteria for systemic therapy may achieve IGA-treatment success with clear/almost clear skin with continuous-use ruxolitinib cream, and maintain long term-disease control with as-needed ruxolitinib cream monotherapy. NCT03745638/NCT03745651.