Abstract

Many researchers and policymakers assume a strong, direct relationship between teachers' self-reported intentions to stay and their observed retention. This study critically reviews 24 studies on teachers’ turnover intentions, illustrating the range of ways this construct has been conceptualized and measured as a proxy for actual retention. Second, analyzing survey and nine-years of retention data from 620 mathematics teachers, this study finds that the relationship between intended and observed retention is weak, regardless of specification or measure. Turnover intentions may still be a valuable construct but may be more related to psychological commitment than actual retention.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.