Issues surrounding clinical trial endpoints in solid malignancies with a focus on metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract

Relative to best supportive care alone, cytotoxic chemotherapy has an established role in prolonging overall survival (OS) in patients with or without previous treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OS has been the principal endpoint influencing regulatory decisions regarding targeted therapies for metastatic NSCLC, including the vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab in the frontline setting and the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib in patients after prior treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), another common endpoint in oncology clinical trials, has been discussed as a potential surrogate for OS in metastatic NSCLC. A number of phase III clinical trials of investigational targeted agents for treatment of metastatic NSCLC are ongoing, with OS designated as the primary endpoint in some cases and PFS in others. Both endpoints have been developed largely to evaluate outcomes in unselected populations in which a fraction of patients are anticipated to derive significant benefit. New approaches are being considered for the evaluation of targeted agents. Recent high profile trials have been designed to assess PFS using a randomized discontinuation design and disease control rate after 8weeks of treatment. With a series of recent advances toward increasingly personalized biomarker-directed anticancer therapies, the appropriateness of the traditional regulatory approach has been questioned.