Abstract

The design of intergovernmental transfers has a huge bearing on the efficiency and equity of public service provision as they play a prominent role in financing subnational governments across the world. In the first-generation theory (FGT) of fiscal federalism, they are viewed as economic policy tools to correct imperfections. The FGT assumed that decision makers are benevolent actors who would intervene to provide public goods efficiently. On the other hand, the recently emerged second generation theory (SGT) of fiscal federalism focuses on the political economy implications of transfers and pays attention to the institutional and political incentives that induce or constrain the behaviour of politicians. The SGT sees intergovernmental transfers as a potential tempting target for rent-seeking politics. This chapter summarizes the main arguments of both theories and provides examples from federations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.