Abstract
The possibility that arbitrators entrusted with resolving investment disputes may have so-called ‘issue-conflicts’ has provoked some angry criticism, contentious debate, awardannulments, and fledgling prohibitions. The discussion and current thinking appear to overlook the consequences stemming from adopting general prohibitions which are not justified in many cases. This essay calls for calm, sober, analysis to frame the matter objectively and to ensure that the measures adopted are not overly and unnecessarily prohibitive: a net cast too wide.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
