Abstract
AbstractNumerous methodologies and technologies of varying levels of sophistication for irrigation rate determination have been developed over the years to address limited irrigation water availability and optimize water productivity. Crop evapotranspiration is currently evaluated mostly according to the FAO56 approach, which has been augmented in recent years with remote sensing of correlated plant indices. When no other information is available, the evapotranspiration rate does give an indication of the optimal irrigation rate in some circumstances. However, in many other circumstances discussed in this short communication, replenishing the soil with crop evapotranspiration either substantially overestimates or underestimates the optimal, physiological (agronomical/economical) irrigation rate. Consequently, this note raises doubts and opens a discussion about the extensive reliance on the evaluated crop (potential or actual) evapotranspiration rate for recommending an optimal irrigation rate (irrigation dose/irrigation amount).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
