Is stopping secondary prophylaxis safe in HIV-positive talaromycosis patients? Experience from Myanmar.

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to determine whether it is safe to stop secondary prophylaxis in patients with talaromycosis after immune reconstitution with a sustained increase in CD4 count to ≥ 100 cells/µL after antiretroviral therapy (ART).MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed in HIV‐infected patients treated for talaromycosis between June 2009 and June 2017 in Medical Action Myanmar (MAM) clinics.ResultsAmong a cohort of 5466 HIV‐infected patients, 41 patients were diagnosed with and treated for clinical talaromycosis. All the patients were on ART and had a CD4 count < 100 cells/µL. Of these 41 patients, 24 patients (71%) were skin smear positive for talaromycosis, while results were negative in 17 patients. Median CD4 count and haemoglobin concentration were 24 cells/µL and 7.7 g/dL, respectively. Seventy‐three per cent (30) were male. Among the 41 patients, 11 (27%) died and six (15%) were transferred to other centres. Twenty‐four patients (58% of the total diagnosed) stopped itraconazole secondary prophylaxis after starting active ART with CD4 counts > 100 cells/µL for at least 1 year. Throughout the duration of follow‐up post itraconazole cessation, the observed incidence of relapse was zero with a total follow‐up of 93.8 person‐years (95% confidence interval 0–4 per 100 person‐years). The median (25th, 75th percentile) duration of follow‐up post‐prophylaxis discontinuation was 2.8 (2.1, 6.3) years.ConclusionsSecondary prophylaxis can be safely stopped in patients with talaromycosis after immune reconstitution with a sustained increase in CD4 count to ≥ 100 cells/µL after highly active antiretroviral therapy.