Abstract
We extend and refine the welfare game developed by Coate et al. (2002) in two directions. First, by allowing the client and auditor to choose their strategies sequentially, we show that the most efficient equilibrium is that the client moves first to honestly report earnings, which is followed by the auditor that chooses to perform a normal audit. Second, by including the possibility that the client can corrupt the auditor with side payments, which results in a failed audit, the regulator can impose an ex ante flexible penalty level that increases in proportion to the client’s maximum benefits from misstating earnings. Such a preemptive regulation makes the most efficient equilibrium obtainable in which the client will move forward to report earnings honestly, followed by the normal audit strategy chosen by the auditor, even when the auditor may not be independent.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
