Is Fetal Reduction Necessary in Triplet Pregnancy? Single Tertiary Center Experience

Abstract

Objective This study aims to evaluate the perinatal outcomes of triplet pregnancies reduced from triplets to twins with fetal reduction (FR), followed expectantly without FR, and reduced to triplets from higher-order multiple pregnancies (HOMP) with FR. Materials and methods Multifetal pregnancies followed at the university hospital in the last 8 years were evaluated retrospectively. The study group was composed of three groups. The first group was those who started as trichorionic-triamniotic (TCTA) triplets and were followed by triplets. The second group consisted of HOMPs reduced to TCTA triplets with FR. The third group consisted of pregnant women who started as TCTA triplets and were reduced to dichorionic-diamniotic (DCDA) twins with FR. Results A total of 69 multifetal pregnancies were included in the study. No statistical difference was observed between miscarriage rates in all groups (p = 0.190). Birth rates below 32 weeks were similar between groups (p = 0.158). The birth rates below 34 weeks were statistically significantly lower in the group in which DCDA was reduced by TCTA compared to the other two groups (p = 0.001). The first and second fetus weights in the group reduced to DCDA twins from TCTA were higher than the group followed expectantly, they were similar to the triplets reduced from HOMP. Stillbirth rates were similar in all groups (p = 0.057). Conclusion In TCTA pregnancies, when the priority is three live-born babies, expectant management seems to be a reasonable choice, considering the low rate of miscarriage and high rate of survivor neonates in this group.