Abstract
This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes and complications between operatively and nonoperatively treated medial epicondyle fractures with displacement of >5 mm as accurately measured on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT). We retrospectively reviewed 77 patients who had isolated medial epicondylar fractures with displacement of >5 mm. The mean age at injury was 11.4 years. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: 21 patients treated nonoperatively and 56 patients treated surgically. Additionally, patients treated operatively were divided into two subgroups according to fixation method; 31 patients underwent internal fixation with K-wires and 25 patients underwent internal fixation with a screw. Radiological and functional outcomes were compared among the three groups. Although the bony union rate was significantly higher in patients treated operatively compared to patients treated non-operatively (96.4% vs. 23.8%, p < 0.001), there were no significant differences in functional outcomes between the two groups. In the nonoperative group, three patients underwent osteosynthesis for symptomatic nonunion. There were no significant differences in radiological and functional outcomes between the two subgroups divided by fixation method. In a pediatric medial epicondylar fracture with a displacement of >5 mm as accurately measured on 3D CT, despite the difference in union rate, there was no difference in functional outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment. Performing CT only to measure the fracture displacement in obviously displaced medial epicondylar fracture is not considered as a part of the “necessary” diagnostic workups.
Highlights
No consensus exists in the literature as to the amount of fracture displacement that warrants surgical intervention, 5 mm of displacement has often been recommended as the threshold for surgical intervention [1,2,3,4,5]
Patients were excluded for the following reasons: another upper extremity fracture, a history of elbow surgery or deformity, insufficient medical records, and inadequate preoperative 3D CT or follow-up radiographs available for review
We initially identified 168 patients who were treated for medial epicondyle fractures with displacement of >5 mm
Summary
No consensus exists in the literature as to the amount of fracture displacement that warrants surgical intervention, 5 mm of displacement has often been recommended as the threshold for surgical intervention [1,2,3,4,5]. Literature is scarce regarding the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatments for medial epicondylar fractures with a significant displacement of. Most previous comparative studies included patients with even minimal displaced fractures of
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
