Irrigation reform in conditions of populist anarchy: An Indian case

Abstract

It is true that the performance of India's canal-irrigated agriculture could be substantially and cheaply improved by change in canal operating and maintenance procedures. But current procedures allow some farmers and state officials to capture disproportionate benefits for themselves through a well-institutionalised system of corruption. These beneficiaries of the status quo make up powerful interes groups against reform. The paper illustrates just how intensely ‘political’ irrigation reform can be, by tracing what happened when an attempt was made to carry out an apparently simple improvement in water allocation rules under a South Indian canal. The events suggest a wider process of cumulative causation making for low rates of growth of food production and weaker political authority. The process is not inevitable, however, and the paper ends with some suggestions about how, in the irrigation context, public policy might help to offset the decline.