Invited Commentary

Abstract

HomeRadioGraphicsVol. 32, No. 5 PreviousNext Women’s ImagingInvited CommentaryDarcy J. WolfmanDarcy J. WolfmanAuthor AffiliationsDepartment of Radiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Bethesda, MarylandDarcy J. WolfmanPublished Online:Aug 31 2012https://doi.org/10.1148/Radiographics.32.5.125001MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References1 Parker RA, Yano M, Tai AW, Friedman M, Narra VR, Menias CO. MR imaging findings of ectopic pregnancy: a pictorial review. RadioGraphics 2012; 32(5):1445–1460. Link, Google Scholar2 Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell Cet al.. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(6):1447–1474. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004;232(3):635–652. Link, Google Scholar4 Kanal E, Shellock FG, Talagala L. Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 1990;176(3): 593–606. Link, Google Scholar5 De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL. A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005;87(2-3):335–353. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Price DL, De Wilde JP, Papadaki AM, Curran JS, Kitney RI. Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13(2):288–293. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Radomskij P, Schmidt MA, Heron CW, Prasher D. Effect of MRI noise on cochlear function. Lancet 2002;359(9316):1485–1486. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for the submission of premarket notifications for magnetic resonance devices. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Web site. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm073817.htm. Published November 14, 1998. Accessed December 21, 2011. Google Scholar9 Reeves MJ, Brandreth M, Whitby EHet al.. Neonatal cochlear function: measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging. Radiology 2010;257(3):802–809. Link, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished online: Aug 31 2012Published in print: Sept 2012 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRecommended Articles First-Trimester Exposure to Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: A Utilization Study of 4.6 Million U.S. PregnanciesRadiology2019Volume: 293Issue: 1pp. 193-200Hemodynamic Responses of the Placenta and Brain to Maternal Hyperoxia in Fetuses with Congenital Heart Disease by Using Blood Oxygen–Level Dependent MRIRadiology2019Volume: 294Issue: 1pp. 141-148Gadolinium Chelate Safety in Pregnancy: Barely Detectable Gadolinium Levels in the Juvenile Nonhuman Primate after in Utero ExposureRadiology2017Volume: 286Issue: 1pp. 122-128Imaging Review of Obstetric Sequelae of Maternal Diabetes MellitusRadioGraphics2021Volume: 42Issue: 1pp. 302-319In Utero Exposure to Gadolinium-based Contrast AgentsRadiology2018Volume: 288Issue: 2pp. 633-635See More RSNA Education Exhibits What is Expected When They are Expecting — Imaging and Management of Trauma Pregnant Patient in the Emergency Room Settings and on the Floor: Expectations and Steps to SucceedDigital Posters2019Non-Contrast MRI of Acute Abdominopelvic Pain in Pregnancy: Pathology and PearlsDigital Posters2018MRI as a Problem-Solving tool in Pregnancy Related Uterine ComplicationsDigital Posters2018 RSNA Case Collection Acute appendicitis in pregnancyRSNA Case Collection2020Complete Hydatidiform Molar Pregnancy RSNA Case Collection2021Cesarean Scar ectopic Pregnancy RSNA Case Collection2021 Vol. 32, No. 5 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download