Abstract

The feasibility of N2 alternating CO2 injection was investigated for improving CO2 storage and oil production. Schemes of continuous CO2 injection and N2 alternating CO2 injection were evaluated using laboratory experiments and numerical simulation. According to the core flooding experiments, the CO2 storage factor and enhanced oil recovery of N2 alternating CO2 flooding were 2.1% and 7.1% lower than continuous CO2 injection. The larger the N2 slug volume in N2 alternating CO2 injection, the lower the EOR and CO2 storage factor due to the reduction of CO2 concentration in the gas phase and CO2 solubility in oil and water. However, the N2 slugs in N2 alternating CO2 injection significantly reduced mobility differences between different flowing zones, and thus can increase the gas swept area in an oil reservoir. The gas swept area of the oil reservoir under N2 alternating CO2 injection mode is 1.78 times that of continuous CO2 injection, resulting in a 44% higher cumulative oil production. Besides, the scheme of N2 alternating CO2 injection was optimized and resulted in 19.6% more CO2 storage than continuous CO2 flooding at a field scale. This study provides valuable experimental and theoretical support for improving CO2 storage and oil production in an oil reservoir.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.