Abstract

The design of new High Entropy Alloys that can achieve exceptional mechanical properties is presently of great interest to the materials science community. However, due to the difficulty of designing these alloys using traditional methods, machine learning has recently emerged as an essential tool. Particularly, the screening of candidate alloy compositions using surrogate models has become a mainstay of materials design in recent years. Many of these models use the atomic fractions of the alloying elements as inputs. However, there are many possible representation schemes for encoding alloy compositions, including both unstructured and structured variants. As the input features play a critical role in determining surrogate model performance, we have systematically compared these representation schemes on the basis of their performance in single-task deep learning models and in transfer learning scenarios. The results from these tests indicate that compared to the unstructured and randomly ordered schemes, chemically meaningful arrangements of elements within spatial representation schemes generally lead to better models. However, we also observed that tree-based models using only the atomic fractions as input were able to outperform these models in transfer learning, raising further questions about how and when to use transfer learning in materials design.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.