Abstract
ABSTRACT This study addresses the moral dilemmas associated with Level 4 autonomous or self-driving buses capable of making decisions in moral dilemmas where human intervention is still possible. With the help of a cusp catastrophe model, we examine the choices made by potential users, deciding appropriate responses to moral dilemmas in which their interests are implicated. The findings of these surveys indicate that most respondents exhibited a consequentialist decision-making logic. They placed emphasis on adherence to traffic regulations, safeguarding individuals who abide by the law, and imposing penalties on those who contradict it within the context of the scenarios under consideration..
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
