Abstract

Stimulus-sensitive polymer drug conjugates based on high molecular weight N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymers carrying doxorubicin via a pH-dependent cleavable bond (pHPMA-Dox) were previously shown to be able to overcome multi-drug resistance. Nevertheless, a tumor type dependent differential response was observed. Although an improved and more selective tumor accumulation of pHPMA-Dox is generally achieved due to the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, little is known about the fate of these conjugates upon entering the tumor tissue, which could explain the different responses. In this study, we compared in vitro and in vivo accumulation and Dox-activation of pHPMA-Dox in three cancer cell line models (1411HP, A2780cis, HT29) and derived xenograft tumors using a near-infrared fluorescence-labeled pHPMA-Dox conjugate. Firstly, cytotoxicity assays using different pH conditions proved a stepwise, pH-dependent increase in cytotoxic activity and revealed comparable sensitivity among the cell lines. Using multispectral fluorescence microscopy, we were able to track the distribution of drug and polymeric carrier simultaneously on cellular and histological levels. Microscopic analyses of cell monolayers confirmed the assumed mechanism of cell internalization of the whole conjugate followed by intracellular cleavage and nuclear accumulation of Dox in all three cell lines. In contrast, intratumoral distribution and drug release in xenograft tumors were completely different and were associated with different tissue substructures and microenvironments analyzed by Azan- and Hypoxisense®-staining. In 1411HP tumors, large vessels and less hypoxic/acidic microenvironments were associated with a pattern resulting from consistent tissue distribution and cellular uptake as whole conjugate followed by intracellular drug release. In A2780cis tumors, an inconsistent pattern of distribution partly resulting from premature drug release was associated with a more hypoxic/acidic microenvironment, compacted tumor tissue with compressed vessels and specific pre-damaged tissue structures. A completely different distribution pattern was observed in HT29 tumors, resulting from high accumulation of polymer in abundant fibrotic structures, with small embedded vessels featuring this tumor type together with pronounced premature drug release due to the strongly hypoxic/acidic microenvironment. In conclusion, the pattern of intratumoral distribution and drug release strongly depends on the tumor substructure and microenvironment and may result in different degrees of therapeutic efficacy. This reflects the pronounced heterogeneity observed in the clinical application of nanomedicines and can be exploited for the future design of such conjugates.

Highlights

  • Nanoscaled drug delivery systems are useful tools to improve cancer therapy

  • Both show fast tumor growth and tumor regression after pHPMA-Dox treatment. In both tumor types, the response pattern after treatment with pHPMA-Dox compared to free Dox is completely different

  • Our analyses show that intratumoral distribution and drug release of and response to pH-sensitive polymer drug conjugates can be completely different and that this phenomenon is strongly associated with the specific tumor substructure and microenvironment, which generally can be completely different among tumors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nanoscaled drug delivery systems are useful tools to improve cancer therapy They are designed to overcome the shortcomings of conventional chemotherapy, i.e., low tumor specificity, systemic toxicity and occurrence of resistance, by improving the pharmacokinetic profile and the therapeutic index of chemotherapeutic agents. There is large inter- and intra-individual heterogeneity explaining the heterogeneous outcomes of clinical trials, and several new strategies to improve EPR-mediated tumor targeting are under investigation [3,7]. In this regard, one important aspect is the process of intratumoral distribution of nano-carriers, which can contribute to this heterogeneity [8]. Our present study investigates the association between tumor type specific distribution pattern, stimulus dependent prodrug activation and treatment efficacy

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.