Interventions and Implementation Strategies for Preventing Occupational Contact Dermatitis: A Scoping Review.

The suicidal process is a complex phenomenon involving multiple intertwined factors, which makes its prevention particularly challenging. As evidence-based suicide prevention interventions evolve and consolidate, it becomes increasingly important to ensure that effective interventions are efficiently implemented in practice and translated into the quality programs and care that benefit people at risk of suicidal behavior.

BackgroundStroke survivors often encounter occupational therapy practitioners in rehabilitation practice settings. Occupational therapy researchers have recently begun to examine the implementation strategies that promote the use of evidence-based occupational therapy practices in stroke rehabilitation; however, the heterogeneity in how occupational therapy research is reported has led to confusion about the types of implementation strategies used in occupational therapy and their association with implementation outcomes. This review presents these strategies and corresponding outcomes using uniform language and identifies the extent to which strategy selection has been guided by theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs).MethodsA scoping review protocol was developed to assess the breadth and depth of occupational therapy literature examining implementation strategies, outcomes, and TMFs in the stroke rehabilitation field. Five electronic databases and two peer-reviewed implementation science journals were searched to identify studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers applied the inclusion parameters and consulted with a third reviewer to achieve consensus. The 73-item Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) implementation strategy taxonomy guided the synthesis of implementation strategies. The Implementation Outcomes Framework guided the analysis of measured outcomes.ResultsThe initial search yielded 1219 studies, and 26 were included in the final review. A total of 48 out of 73 discrete implementation strategies were described in the included studies. The most used implementation strategies were “distribute educational materials” (n = 11), “assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators” (n = 11), and “conduct educational outreach visits” (n = 10). “Adoption” was the most frequently measured implementation outcome, while “cost” was not measured in any included studies. Eleven studies reported findings supporting the effectiveness of their implementation strategy or strategies; eleven reported inconclusive findings, and four found that their strategies did not lead to improved implementation outcomes. In twelve studies, at least partially beneficial outcomes were reported, corresponding with researchers using TMFs to guide implementation strategies.ConclusionsThis scoping review synthesized implementation strategies and outcomes that have been examined in occupational therapy and stroke rehabilitation. With the growth of the stroke survivor population, the occupational therapy profession must identify effective strategies that promote the use of evidence-based practices in routine stroke care and describe those strategies, as well as associated outcomes, using uniform nomenclature. Doing so could advance the occupational therapy field’s ability to draw conclusions about effective implementation strategies across diverse practice settings.

Reducing the burden of neonatal sepsis requires timely identification and initiation of suitable antibiotic treatment in primary health care (PHC) settings. Countries are encouraged to adopt simplified antibiotic regimens at the PHC level for treating sick young infants (SYI) with signs of possible serious bacterial infection (PSBI). As countries implement PSBI guidelines, more lessons on effective implementation strategies and outcome measurements are needed. We document pragmatic approaches used to design, measure and report implementation strategies and outcomes while adopting PSBI guidelines in Kenya. We designed implementation research using longitudinal mixed methods embedded in a continuous regular systematic learning and adoption of evidence in the PHC context. We synthesized formative data to co-create with stakeholders, implementation strategies to incorporate PSBI guidelines into routine service delivery for SYIs. This was followed by quarterly monitoring for learning and feedback on the effect of implementation strategies, documented lessons learned and tracked implementation outcomes. We collected endline data to measure the overall effect on service level outcomes. Our findings show that characterizing implementation strategies and linking them with implementation outcomes, helps illustrate the pathway between the implementation process and outcomes. Although we have demonstrated that it is feasible to implement PSBI in PHC, effective investment in continuous capacity strengthening of providers through blended approaches, efficient use of available human resources, and improving the efficiency of service areas for managing SYIs optimizes timely identification and management of SYI. Sustained provision of commodities for management of SYI facilitates increased uptake of services. Strengthening facility-community linkages supports adherence to scheduled visits. Enhancing the caregiver's preparedness during postnatal contacts in the community or facility will facilitate the effective completion of treatment. Careful design, and definition of terms related to the measurement of implementation outcomes and strategies enable ease of interpretation of findings. Using the taxonomy of implementation outcomes help frame the measurement process and provides empirical evidence in a structured way to demonstrate causal relationships between implementation strategies and outcomes. Using this approach, we have illustrated that the implementation of simplified antibiotic regimens for treating SYIs with PSBI in PHC settings is feasible in Kenya.

BackgroundCaring for people with dementia is complex, and there are various evidence-based interventions. However, a gap exists between the available interventions and how to implement them. The objectives of our review are to identify implementation strategies, implementation outcomes, and influencing factors for the implementation of evidence-based interventions that focus on three preselected phenomena in people with dementia: (A) behavior that challenges supporting a person with dementia in long-term care, (B) delirium in acute care, and (C) postacute care needs.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review according to the description of the Joanna Briggs Institute. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. For the data analysis, we conducted deductive content analysis. For this analysis, we used the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC), implementation outcomes according to Proctor and colleagues, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).ResultsWe identified 362 (A), 544 (B), and 714 records (C) on the three phenomena and included 7 (A), 3 (B), and 3 (C) studies. Among the studies, nine reported on the implementation strategies they used. Clusters with the most reported strategies were adapt and tailor to context and train and educate stakeholders. We identified one study that tested the effectiveness of the applied implementation strategy, while ten studies reported implementation outcomes (mostly fidelity). Regarding factors that influence implementation, all identified studies reported between 1 and 19 factors. The most reported factors were available resources and the adaptability of the intervention. To address dementia-specific influencing factors, we enhanced the CFIR construct of patient needs and resources to include family needs and resources.ConclusionsWe found a high degree of homogeneity across the different dementia phenomena, the evidence-based interventions, and the care settings in terms of the implementation strategies used, implementation outcomes measured, and influencing factors identified. However, it remains unclear to what extent implementation strategies themselves are evidence-based and which intervention strategy can be used by practitioners when either the implementation outcomes are not adjusted to the implementation strategy and/or the effects of implementation strategies are mostly unknown. Future research needs to focus on investigating the effectiveness of implementation strategies for evidence-based interventions for dementia care.Trial registrationThe review protocol was prospectively published (Manietta et al., BMJ Open 11:e051611, 2021).

Central venous access devices (CVADs) are critical for neonatal care, but inconsistent CVAD practices remain a challenge and impact clinical outcomes. This scoping review aimed to determine which implementation frameworks, strategies, and outcomes are reported for neonates with CVADs. EMBASE, CINAHL (EBSCO), PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases were searched. All included studies examined were relevant to study aims, published from 2012 to August 2024, and in English. Two reviewers independently screened each study to determine inclusion eligibility, with a third resolving conflicts. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess study quality. Of the 2176 studies identified, 44 studies were included, predominantly performed in intensive care units (n = 41; 93%), at a single site (n = 39; 89%), and over a 1- to 5-year period (n = 33; 75%). "Quality improvement" was the most popular implementation framework (n = 27; 61%). Implementation strategies commonly cited were health professional education (n = 35; 80%), audits and surveillance (n = 34; 77%), and bundles (n = 29; 66%). Multiple implementation strategies were often used simultaneously (n = 43; 98%), and effectiveness and implementation outcomes were combined (n = 20; 45%). Infection was the most commonly reported outcome (n = 37; 84%), and intervention compliance was reported in 50% of studies (n = 22). Current implementation frameworks for CVAD practice are largely driven by unstructured quality improvement initiatives, focusing on a limited range of strategies for health care professionals. Broader, outcome-focused approaches to implementation research in neonatal CVAD practice have not been completed to date.

Evidence-based early childhood development (ECD) programs that strengthen nurturing parenting skills and promote early stimulation, such as Reach Up (RU) and Care for Child Development (CCD), are critical investments for interrupting cycles of intergenerational poverty; however, the implementation impact of these programs varies greatly globally. Analyzing systematically the evidence on the implementation pathways based on contexts (i.e., external and internal influences on intervention implementation), implementation strategies (i.e., mechanisms used to promote program initiation, design, and delivery with existing systems), and implementation outcomes (i.e., related to the implementation goals) can increase the likelihood of implementation success. Our scoping review aimed to identify implementation pathways of RU and CCD programs in low- and middle-income countries. A search in English, Spanish, and Portuguese of grey literature and five databases of peer reviewed literature; from inception through July 16, 2022, yielded 2,267 publications. Using predetermined eligibility criteria, 75 records yielded implementation details for 33 programs across 23 low- and middle-income countries. Two reviewers independently extracted program data on context, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes following a program theory. A thematic analysis identified 37 implementation strategies across six "building blocks of implementation": program emergence, intersectoriality, intervention characteristics, workforce, training, and monitoring systems. Implementation pathways across building blocks are highly influenced by contextual factors, such as infrastructure, social norms, and the target population's demand and interest, which may shape different implementation outcomes. Six 'building blocks' shaping implementation pathways of CCD and RU in LMICs were identified. The careful consideration of context and use of intentional evidence-based planning can enable the successful implementation of ECD nurturing care interventions. We recommend the use of the ECD Implementation Checklist for Enabling Program Scale Up to guide decision-making regarding context and implementation strategies to support implementation outcomes and subsequent ECD program success.

BackgroundFalls are common among older people in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Falls cause considerable morbidity, mortality and reduced quality of life. Of numerous interventional studies of fall prevention interventions in LTCFs, some reduced falls. However, there are challenges to implementing these interventions in real-world (non-trial) clinical practice, and the implementation techniques may be crucial to successful translation. This systematic review thus aimed to synthesise the evidence on implementation strategies, implementation outcomes and clinical outcomes included in fall prevention intervention studies.MethodsA systematic search of six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, Web of Science) and eight grey literature databases was conducted, involving papers published during 2001–2021, in English or Arabic, targeting original empirical studies of fall prevention interventions (experimental and quasi-experimental). Two seminal implementation frameworks guided the categorisation of implementation strategies and outcomes: the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Taxonomy and the Implementation Outcomes Framework. Four ERIC sub-categories and three additional implementation strategies were created to clarify overlapping definitions and reflect the implementation approach. Two independent researchers completed title/abstract and full-text screening, quality appraisal assessment, data abstraction and coding of the implementation strategies and outcomes. A narrative synthesis was performed to analyse results.ResultsFour thousand three hundred ninety-seven potential papers were identified; 31 papers were included, describing 27 different fall prevention studies. These studies used 39 implementation strategies (3–17 per study). Educational and training strategies were used in almost all (n = 26), followed by evaluative strategies (n = 20) and developing stakeholders’ interrelationships (n = 20). Within educational and training strategies, education outreach/meetings (n = 17), distributing educational materials (n = 17) and developing educational materials (n = 13) were the most common, with 36 strategies coded to the ERIC taxonomy. Three strategies were added to allow coding of once-off training, dynamic education and ongoing medical consultation. Among the 15 studies reporting implementation outcomes, fidelity was the most common (n = 8).ConclusionThis is the first study to comprehensively identify the implementation strategies used in falls prevention interventions in LTCFs. Education is the most common implementation strategy used in this setting. This review highlighted that there was poor reporting of the implementation strategies, limited assessment of implementation outcomes, and there was no discernible pattern of implementation strategies used in effective interventions, which should be improved and clearly defined.Trial registrationThis systematic review was registered on the PROSPERO database; registration number: CRD42021239604.

BackgroundThere is growing evidence of the positive effects of electronic health (eHealth) interventions for patients with chronic illness, but implementation of such interventions into practice is challenging. Implementation strategies that potentially impact implementation outcomes and implementation success have been identified. Which strategies are actually used in the implementation of eHealth interventions for patients with chronic illness and which ones are the most effective is unclear.ObjectiveThis systematic realist review aimed to summarize evidence from empirical studies regarding (1) which implementation strategies are used when implementing eHealth interventions for patients with chronic illnesses living at home, (2) implementation outcomes, and (3) the relationship between implementation strategies, implementation outcomes, and degree of implementation success.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they described implementation strategies used to support the integration of eHealth interventions into practice. Implementation strategies were categorized according to 9 categories defined by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change project: (1) engage consumers, (2) use evaluative and iterative strategies, (3) change infrastructure, (4) adapt and tailor to the context, (5) develop stakeholder interrelationships, (6) use financial strategies, (7) support clinicians, (8) provide interactive assistance, and (9) train and educate stakeholders. Implementation outcomes were extracted according to the implementation outcome framework by Proctor and colleagues: (1) acceptability, (2) adoption, (3) appropriateness, (4) cost, (5) feasibility, (6) fidelity, (7) penetration, and (8) sustainability. Implementation success was extracted according to the study authors’ own evaluation of implementation success in relation to the used implementation strategies.ResultsThe implementation strategies management support and engagement, internal and external facilitation, training, and audit and feedback were directly related to implementation success in several studies. No clear relationship was found between the number of implementation strategies used and implementation success.ConclusionsThis is the first review examining implementation strategies, implementation outcomes, and implementation success of studies reporting the implementation of eHealth programs for patients with chronic illnesses living at home. The review indicates that internal and external facilitation, audit and feedback, management support, and training of clinicians are of importance for eHealth implementation. The review also points to the lack of eHealth studies that report implementation strategies in a comprehensive way and highlights the need to design robust studies focusing on implementation strategies in the future.Trial RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42018085539; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=85539

BackgroundApproximately one in six children has a disability, and effective, evidence-based rehabilitation can ameliorate the impact of these conditions over the lifespan. However, implementing interventions in real-world settings remains a challenge. This scoping review aimed to summarize the characteristics, implementation strategies, and outcomes of implementation studies in pediatric rehabilitation.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from the database inception to December 2, 2022. Studies testing implementation strategies in pediatric rehabilitation interventions were included. Data extracted included study characteristics (e.g., country, intervention type, field of rehabilitation), implementation strategies characterized using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy, and outcomes based on the Implementation Outcomes Framework.ResultsOf the 11,740 studies identified, 44 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 15, 34%) or Canada (n = 10, 23%) and used a mixed-methods design (n = 13, 30%). Interventions primarily targeted motor skills (n = 19, 43%) and were conducted in outpatient settings (n = 14, 32%) or homes (n = 11, 23%). The most commonly used implementation strategies were “train and educate key informant” (n = 21, 48%) and “use evaluative/iterative strategies” (n = 19, 43%). Feasibility (n = 19, 43%) and acceptability (n = 16, 36%) were the most frequently targeted implementation outcomes.ConclusionsReporting implementation strategies and outcomes in pediatric rehabilitation studies is limited and highly variable. Most strategies focused on developing and sharing educational materials, while administrative and systems-level interventions were largely absent. Standardized documentation of implementation strategies and outcomes could advance the field’s understanding of the effective development of interventions designed for implementation, encouraging faster uptake of effective interventions.

Youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have high rates of co-occurring mental health needs that necessitate mental health interventions. Given the unique clinical characteristics of youth with ASD, there have been significant efforts to adapt and test mental health interventions for this population. Yet, characterization of the nature and types of interventions adaptations is limited, especially across the wide range of interventions tested for youth with ASD with a focus on implementation factors. Additionally, understanding how these interventions may be implemented in community services is limited. The aims of this systematic review are to characterize the (1) types of interventions tested for co-occurring mental health conditions for youth with ASD; (2) adaptations to mental health interventions for use with youth with ASD; and (3) implementation strategies, outcomes, and determinants of mental health interventions to inform their translation to community service settings. Eighty-three articles testing interventions targeting mental health symptoms in youth with ASD that included implementation factors in analyses were reviewed. The Stirman et al. (2013; 2019) FRAME adaptation, Powell et al. (2012;2015) implementation strategies, and Proctor et al. (2011) implementation outcomes taxonomies were applied to characterize the nature and types of adaptations for use with youth with ASD and types of implementation strategies, outcomes, and determinants used, when available, respectively. Of the interventions examined, the majority (64.1%) were originally designed to target youth mental health concerns and were then adapted to be used with ASD. The most common adaptations included those to the intervention content, particularly adding elements with tailoring or refining aspects of the intervention while maintaining core functions. Half of the articles described at least one implementation strategy used during intervention testing. Fidelity and acceptability were the most frequently examined implementation outcomes, with some examination of appropriateness and feasibility. Nineteen percent of articles described implementation determinants (i.e. barriers/facilitators) of these implementation outcomes. The common adaptations for ASD provide direction for future intervention development and for training community therapists. Further examination, specification, and reporting of implementation strategies and outcomes within ongoing efforts to adapt and interventions to meet the co-occurring mental health needs of youth ASD are needed to facilitate their translation to community settings. Areas for future research as well as clinical implications are discussed.

BackgroundWhile eMental health interventions can have many potential benefits for mental health care, implementation outcomes are often disappointing. In order to improve these outcomes, there is a need for a better understanding of complex, dynamic interactions between a broad range of implementation-related factors. These interactions and processes should be studied holistically, paying attention to factors related to context, technology, and people.ObjectiveThe main objective of this mixed-method study was to holistically evaluate the implementation strategies and outcomes of an eMental health intervention in an organization for forensic mental health care.MethodsFirst, desk research was performed on 18 documents on the implementation process. Second, the intervention’s use by 721 patients and 172 therapists was analyzed via log data. Third, semistructured interviews were conducted with all 18 therapists of one outpatient clinic to identify broad factors that influence implementation outcomes. The interviews were analyzed via a combination of deductive analysis using the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework and inductive, open coding.ResultsThe timeline generated via desk research showed that implementation strategies focused on technical skills training of therapists. Log data analyses demonstrated that 1019 modules were started, and 18.65% (721/3865) of patients of the forensic hospital started at least one module. Of these patients, 18.0% (130/721) completed at least one module. Of the therapists using the module, 54.1% (93/172 sent at least one feedback message to a patient. The median number of feedback messages sent per therapist was 1, with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 460. Interviews showed that therapists did not always introduce the intervention to patients and using the intervention was not part of their daily routine. Also, therapists indicated patients often did not have the required conscientiousness and literacy levels. Furthermore, they had mixed opinions about the design of the intervention. Important organization-related factors were the need for more support and better integration in organizational structures. Finally, therapists stated that despite its current low use, the intervention had the potential to improve the quality of treatment.ConclusionsSynthesis of different types of data showed that implementation outcomes were mostly disappointing. Implementation strategies focused on technical training of therapists, while little attention was paid to changes in the organization, design of the technology, and patient awareness. A more holistic approach toward implementation strategies—with more attention to the organization, patients, technology, and training therapists—might have resulted in better implementation outcomes. Overall, adaptivity appears to be an important concept in eHealth implementation: a technology should be easily adaptable to an individual patient, therapists should be trained to deal flexibly with an eMental health intervention in their treatment, and organizations should adapt their implementation strategies and structures to embed a new eHealth intervention.

Dissemination and evaluation of the PAX Good Behavior Game (PAX GBG) have produced a body of published and unpublished literature that, if mapped, can provide valuable insights for future expansion and evaluation efforts. Conducting a scoping review of implementation and dissemination studies and gray literature (i.e., “sources”), we aimed to identify (1) implementation strategies being used to support PAX GBG in schools, (2) implementation outcomes assessed across sources, and (3) dissemination strategies being used to promote practice-based implementation of PAX GBG in schools. Our search strategies resulted in 47 sources meeting criteria for full-text extraction. We identified eight implementation strategies: Ongoing consultation/coaching, promoting adaptability (as uniquely defined by each author team), and adaptation of training were the most common. These strategies may be important for future evaluation. Implementation fidelity, implementation quality, and data on coaching sessions (e.g., number/length of sessions) were the most commonly assessed implementation outcomes. However, implementation outcomes were assessed in less than 60% of sources, highlighting the need for feasible methods for documenting such outcomes. The most commonly mentioned dissemination strategies were identifying determinants of innovation uptake, increasing audience skills, funding, and adapting information to context. However, no sources explicitly evaluated the impact of dissemination strategies, underscoring an important direction for future studies.

Background Implementation mechanisms are defined as processes or events through which implementation strategies operate to affect one or more implementation outcomes. Understanding the mechanisms through which implementation strategies work is critical to understanding how and why implementation efforts are successful, and to matching, tailoring, and optimizing implementation strategies. This study examined the content of abstracts included in the program for the 2019 Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference to characterize the presence of data related to implementation strategy mechanisms and their larger causal pathways. Methods Trained coders reviewed all 205 accepted abstracts and extracted information regarding discrete implementation strategies, determinants of implementation, implementation mechanisms, service outcomes, and implementation outcomes. Theoretical articles were omitted from further analyses due to their inability to offer data related to implementation mechanisms. Results Of the 151 empirical studies included, only 11 (7.28%) reported studying mechanisms. Mechanisms were examined in projects utilizing 14 different implementation strategies. We were able to construct implementation causal pathways for just two implementation strategies, "assess for readiness and identify determinants," representing information pulled from four different abstracts, and "create a learning collaborative," with data pulled from just one abstract. Conclusions These findings indicate that, at least based on SIRC conference abstracts, the empirical investigation of implementation mechanisms remains understudied, highlighting the need for focused research on the study of mechanisms. Plain Language Summary Understanding the mechanisms through which implementation strategies work is critical to understanding how and why implementation efforts are successful. The study of implementation mechanisms may be used to optimize implementation strategy decisions. Investigations to date have not established causal pathways linking implementation strategies, mechanisms, barriers, and outcomes. This study examined abstracts included in the program for the 2019 Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference. Trained coders reviewed all 205 accepted abstracts and extracted information to characterize the presence of data related to implementation strategy causal pathways. A minority of abstracts reported studying mechanisms. We were able to construct implementation causal pathways for just two implementation strategies, representing information pulled from five different abstracts all together. This highlights the need for focused research on the study of mechanisms.

Decision support systems (DSSs) are computerized tools that analyse data to guide actions and inform decision-making. Although DSSs are increasingly used in infectious disease contexts, their adoption remains inconsistent. Effective implementation is essential for integration of these tools into practice. Implementation strategies that promote sustainable uptake have not been comprehensively mapped for infectious disease DSSs. This scoping review aimed to identify and describe implementation strategies, associated outcomes, and use of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) in the implementation of infectious disease DSSs designed for early warning, detection, or prevention. A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A limited search in MEDLINE was used to develop the search strategy based on relevant publications. The final search was applied across MEDLINE, CAB Direct, AGRICOLA, and Web of Science using a time limiter (2000-2025). Studies were screened against eligibility criteria by two independent reviewers. Data were charted on implementation strategies, outcomes, and TMFs. Strategies were mapped to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy, and outcomes were mapped to Proctor's implementation outcomes taxonomy. Data were synthesized by grouping DSSs according to their primary level of public health action: clinical/individual, population/program, or system/governance. Reported or codable strategies, outcomes, and TMFs were summarized within each level of action. Of the 18,708 records identified, 26 studies reported in 27 publications met the inclusion criteria. In total, 20 unique implementation strategies were identified through reviewer coding of narrative descriptions, 7 implementation outcomes were inferred from descriptive indicators, and 3 TMFs were reported in the literature. Clinical/individual-level DSSs included 13 strategies, 7 outcomes, and 2 TMFs; population/program-level DSSs included 13 strategies, 7 outcomes, and 1 TMF; and system/governance-level DSSs included 7 strategies, 3 outcomes, and no TMFs. Implementation of infectious disease DSSs most often involved activities that mapped to educational and stakeholder engagement strategies, with limited reported use of guiding theories or frameworks. Although outcome reporting was relatively common, outcome definitions and depth of outcome reporting varied widely. More deliberate use of TMFs and systematic outcome evaluation could strengthen the evidence base for DSS implementation. In policy and management contexts, better alignment between strategy selection, system design, and public health objectives may enhance sustainable DSS adoption and impact. Not applicable.

ABSTRACTIntroduction:Falls are a major health concern for older adults, particularly those with cognitive impairment. Many factors contribute to the risk of falls, making it a complex issue to manage.Aim:This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the implementation strategies used for fall prevention in community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment.Eligibility criteria:The review included studies on fall prevention interventions for community-dwelling adults aged > 50 years with cognitive impairment. Eligible studies were primary research, including experimental, quasi-experimental, qualitative, and mixed methods designs, with detailed implementation strategies. Systematic reviews, protocols, editorials, opinions, commentaries, and conference papers were excluded.Methods:This review followed the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness and was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five databases were searched for studies published in English after 2000: MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Data on implementation strategies and outcomes were extracted and synthesized using the ERIC framework and Proctor's implementation taxonomy.Results:Twenty-one studies met the eligibility criteria. Twenty-four implementation strategies were identified, with 15 directly fitting the ERIC list and 9 additional strategies emerging. The most common strategies were engaging consumers (i.e., patients and family members or caregivers) (n = 13), adapting and tailoring to context (n = 9), and training and educating stakeholders (n = 8). Implementation outcomes were reported inconsistently across studies. Several implementation strategies were often used, but their combined effects on fall prevention outcomes were not clearly reported.Conclusions:This review indicates that engaging consumers, particularly family members, was the most common implementation strategy to prevent falls. The review also highlights new strategies, such as providing culturally appropriate interventions and using dementia-trained instructors. Lastly, the review identifies the need for clearer reporting of implementation strategies and outcomes in future studies.Review registration:PROSPERO CRD4202454689Spanish abstract:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A380