Abstract
• An ‘extraterritorial gap’ in political geography and comparative politics impedes analysis of authoritarian power abroad. • Authoritarian rule from the home state continues to be exercised over populations abroad. • It treats nationals abroad as subjects or outlaws; patriots or traitors; clients or brokers, but never as citizens. • Authoritarianism should be studied as a mode of governing people through a set of practices, not as a territorial regime.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
