Abstract
Use of the Hebb-Williams closed-field test as a comparative technique is examined. Restriction of analysis to total error zone scores on a standard problem battery is criticized, and examples are given of other performance measures which may be more sensitive to interspecies differences.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.