Abstract
AbstractThe usefulness of the ACT and 16 PF for discriminating between decided and undecided college students was investigated. Different discriminant functions were derived for males and females, indicating a need for different counseling procedures. A canonical correlation analysis of the ACT versus the 16 PF indicated a strong relationship between the two instruments, even though redundancies were low. Six factors emerged in a factor analysis of the ACT, 16 PF, sex, hours earned, GPA, and group: an academic potential factor, four personality factors, and a school achievement factor.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
