Interrelationship Between Indoor Air Quality and Indoor Dust in Four Schools across Dhanbad City, India

Exposure of polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs) to Pakistani populations via non-dietary sources from neglected e-waste hubs: A problem of high health concern

A review of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in the indoor environment: occurrence in consumer products, indoor air and dust

A review of organophosphate esters in indoor dust, air, hand wipes and silicone wristbands: Implications for human exposure

Pet hair as a potential sentinel of human exposure: Investigating partitioning and exposures from OPEs and PAHs in indoor dust, air, and pet hair from China

Ornamental houseplants as potential biosamplers for indoor pollution of organophosphorus flame retardants

Exposure to organophosphate esters in elderly people: Relationships of OPE body burdens with indoor air and dust concentrations and food consumption.

The interest in phthalate esters (PAEs) has increased in recent years because elevated phthalate levels have been detected in environmental matrices and they have certain adverse effects on human health. Indoor dust from 90 homes and outdoor (street) dust from outside these homes were collected in Kocaeli province between February and April 2016 and analyzed for eight PAEs. The total indoor dust concentrations of eight PAEs (Σ8PAEs) ranged from 21.33 μg g-1 to 1802 μg g-1 (median, 387.67 μg g-1), significantly higher than outdoor dust concentrations (0.16-36.85 μg g-1 with median 4.84 μg g-1). Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) was the most dominant pollutant in both indoor and outdoor environments with a median value of 316.02 μg g-1 and 3.89 μg g-1, respectively, followed by di-n-butyl phthalate and butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP). DEHP was measured within the range of 198.54-816.92 μg g-1 and BBP within the range of 15.52-495.33 μg g-1 in homes with PVC coating, significantly higher than the levels in homes with parquet and tiled floor (p<0.05). Monte Carlo simulation was applied to probabilistically estimate exposure to PAEs and associated carcinogenic risk. The Σ5PAE median values of non-dietary ingestion and dermal absorption exposure were estimated as 1.57 μg kg day-1 and 0.007 μg kg day-1 for children and 0.09 μg kg day-1 and 0.04 μg kg day-1 for adults while inhalation route exposure to PAE in dust was at a negligible level for both groups. Children were more exposed to PAEs through ingestion route (92.74% to 99.54% of the total exposure) while adult exposure through ingestion routes (62-68.4%) and dermal absorption (29.74% and 31.87% of the total exposure) were comparable. The mean cancer risk level via non-dietary ingestion of DEHP for children was 2.33×10-6, about eight times higher than the levels for adults. The risk levels of about 16% of adults and 95% of children are greater than the threshold value of 10-6 when the population is exposed to DEHP in indoor dust. Looking from the viewpoint of child health, the most effective method to reduce exposure among the measured PAEs is to keep the release of DEHP under control, especially in indoor environment, and to take precautions to reduce exposure.

Particle-phase concentrations and sources of legacy and novel flame retardants in outdoor and indoor environments across Spain

Heavy metals contamination status and health risk assessment of indoor and outdoor dust in Ahvaz and Zabol cities, Iran

Occurrence and risk of human exposure to organophosphate flame retardants in indoor air and dust in Hanoi, Vietnam

Ten polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and 16 novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs) were measured in air and dust samples collected in a test home in Harbin, China, from January 2017 to June 2018. The PBDE and NBFR concentrations in indoor air were in the ranges of 0.598-14.5pgm-3 and 9.28-686pgm-3, respectively. The ranges of the PBDE and NBFR concentrations in indoor dust were 221-1060ngg-1 and 71.9-1160ngg-1, respectively. Brominated flame retardant (BFR) concentrations in indoor air were affected by the temperature, relative humidity (RH), and ventilation. The BFR concentrations in indoor dust did not show temperature dependence. All dust samples were sieved into 6 size fractions (F1-F6: 1000-2000μm, 500-1000μm, 250-500μm, 125-250μm, 63-125μm, and < 63μm). The mass percentage of BFRs in F6 was the highest. The BFR concentrations did not increase constantly with a particle size decrease, and the concentrations in F2 were higher than those in F3. The partitioning behavior of BFRs illustrates that the dust-air partitioning coefficient approximately approached equilibrium within F5, F6, and the total dust fraction (FA) in the test home when logKOA was between 9.1 and 11.32. Air-dust fugacity fractions were calculated, and the results suggested that most of the BFRs were mainly transferred from air to dust in the indoor environment for F1-F6.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in indoor air and dust samples of different Saudi microenvironments; health and carcinogenic risk assessment for the general population

ABSTRACTA method coupling automated thermal desorption and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was developed and used for the quantification of 16 PAHs (acenaphthene, anthracene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[e]pyrene, benzo[g,h,i]perylene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, fluoranthene, fluorene, indeno(1, 2, 3)pyrene, naphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene) in indoor air and dust. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in indoor air were sampled using Tenax-TA passive samplers (PAS) exposed during 14 days. Indoor dust, collected on filters using a modified vacuum cleaner head equipped with a sieving device, was first extracted using accelerated solvent extractor. The extract was then concentrated and deposed on a Tenax-TA tube prior to analysis. Using the same thermal desorption method for the analysis of two different matrices gives complementary results with good sensitivity. Limit of detection varied between 0.009 and 0.031 ng and between 0.076 and 0.22 ng/g for PAS and dust, respectively. Likewise, limit of quantification varied between 0.03 and 0.10 ng and between 0.253 and 0.733 ng/g. Results showed that indoor PAH concentrations remains constant, whereas outdoor contamination presents high variability depending on conditions.

Concentrations of 27 emerging (EFRs) and legacy flame retardants (LFRs) were measured in samples of indoor air (n = 35) and indoor dust (n = 77) from UK homes and offices. All target compounds were detected in indoor air and dust samples. Relatively volatile EFRs (e.g., tetrabromoethylcyclohexane-DBE-DBCH) were more frequently detected in indoor air (detection frequencies >60%), while less volatile EFRs (e.g., tetrabromobisphenolA-bis(2,3-dibromopropyl ether (TBBPA-BDBPE) and decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE)) were predominant in dust. Concentrations of some EFRs (e.g., DBDPE) exceeded significantly those reported previously in UK dust (p < 0.05), while concentrations of BDE-209 in office dust were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those reported previously in UK offices, consistent with the application of DBDPE as an alternative to the Deca-BDE formulation, of which BDE-209 is the principal constituent. Moreover, concentrations of BDEs-47 and -99 (both major constituents of the Penta-BDE product) in office air were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those in previous UK studies. Our results constitute important early evidence that restrictions on PBDEs have increased demand for EFRs in the UK, with the result that human exposure to PBDEs in UK homes and offices has decreased while exposure to EFRs has risen.

Triazine UV filters are an important class of UV filters, but knowledge on their environmental occurrence and human exposure remains largely unknown. In this study, we performed a targeted analysis of 17 emerging triazine UV filters in indoor dust and indoor air from South China based on a newly developed LC-MS/MS method. A total of 12 of the 17 emerging triazine UV filters were first positively detected in the dust and air samples. Ethylhexyl triazone (EHT) and bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine (BEMT) were identified as the most abundant compounds. The median total concentrations of triazine UV filters reached 3860 ng/g in indoor dust and 1590 pg/m3 in indoor air. Gas-particle partitioning analysis showed that triazine UV filters were predominant in the particle phase in ambient air. Significant concentration correlations were observed among most triazine UV filters. The estimated daily intake of triazine UV filters through dust ingestion and air inhalation for toddlers under high-end exposure scenarios was up to 839 ng/kg bw/day, but a lack of toxic thresholds hampers accurate risk assessment. Our work highlights another emerging class of UV filters that significantly contribute to indoor chemical mixtures and expresses concerns over their occurrence and human exposure.