Interrater and intrarater agreement superior for three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA) over 2D-DSA classification for detecting remnants after intracranial aneurysm clipping, a GRRAS Reliability and Agreement Study.

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA) is superior to 2D-DSA in detection of intracranial aneurysm (IA) remnants after clipping. With a simple, practical quantitative scale proposed to measure maximal remnant dimension on 3D-DSA, this study provides a rigorous interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement study comparing this newly established scale with a commonly used (Sindou) 2D-DSA scale. Records of 43 patients with clipped IAs harboring various sized remnants who underwent 2D- and 3D-DSA between 2012 and 2018 were evaluated. Using the 2D and 3D scales, six raters scored these remnants and repeated the scoring task 8weeks later. Interrater and intrarater agreement for both grading schemes were calculated using kappa (κ) statistics. Interrater agreement was highly significant, yielding κ-values at 95% CI (p = 0.000) of 0.225 for the first [0.185; 0.265] and 0.368s [0.328; 0.408] time points for 2D-DSA and values of 0.700 for the first [0.654; 0.745] and 0.776s [0.729; 0.822] time points for 3D-DSA. Intrarater agreement demonstrated κ-values between 0.139 and 0.512 for 2D-DSA and between 0.487 and 0.813 for 3D-DSA scores. Interrater and intrarater agreement was minimal or weak for 2D-DSA scores, but strong for 3D-DSA scores. We propose that baseline 3D-DSA characterization may prove more reliable when categorizing clipped IA remnants for purposes of risk stratification and lifelong follow-up.