Abstract

The Cohen (1960) kappa interrater agreement coefficient has been criticized for penalizing raters (e.g., diagnosticians) for their a priori agreement about the base rates of categories (e.g., base rates of disorders). A modification of kappa, called kappan (alias S coefficient, C coefficient, G index, and RE coefficient) has been proposed as an alternative to Cohen's kappa: Kappan was intended to reward rather than penalize classification agreements attributable to interrater agreement about base rates. In this article, we show that kappan has some serious limitations: It can be large when raters who randomly assign objects (e.g., patients) to categories (diagnoses) radically disagree about base rates, and it can be much larger when these raters have very different beliefs about base rates than when they are in complete agreement about base rates. Contrary to the views of recent critics of Cohen's kappa, we argue that Cohen's kappa (which does not have these serious limitations) is generally preferable to...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.