Abstract
International variations in intrauterine growth have consistently been judged in terms of average birthweight, low birthweight or birthweight-for-gestational age criteria. Neither of these provide an appropriate assessment of fetal growth. Notwithstanding these limitations the available evidence indicates that variations in growth, both within and among populations, relate predominantly to differences in the prevalence of factors that restrain growth rather than to inherent differences in growth potential. The evidence also indicates that differences in the frequency of low weight-for-gestation among populations do not only reflect factors that restrict fetal growth. They are also intimately linked to variations in gestational age and to frequencies of preterm birth in particular. Hence, if weight-for-gestational standards are to become more informative and more universally applied than they have been so far, it may be useful to acknowledge their limitations more explicitly and simplify their implementation in a wider range of communities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
