Internal Medicine Resident Evaluations of Attending Physicians.

Introduction: Impulsivity means acting with the least thought towards future behaviors or acting based on thoughts that are not the best option for a person or others. This study was conducted to investigate psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Impulsive Behavior Scale (IBS) of Barratt on pre-hospital personnel of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2023. Materials and Methods: This methodological study was conducted 18 pre-hospital emergency centers of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences during 2022-2023. In this study, the Persian version of the IBS has been used. Face and content validity of the scale in this study was confirmed using qualitative and quantitative methods, and construct validity was confirmed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated by Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for each field and the scale. Results: The IBS had three unplanned, motor and attentional subscales with 23 items and the varimax rotation showed variance of 52.06%. In CFA, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was equal to 0.093 and normalized fit index (NFI), comparative fit index (CFI), goodness of fit (GFI) and incremental fit index (IFI) were higher than 0.9. Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the scale was 0.85%, and the intra-subject correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.84%. Conclusion: The study results showed that the scale for pre-hospital personnel had the required validity and reliability, and it can be used for the impulsive behavior in pre-hospital personnel.

Psoriasis has been demonstrated to have substantial impacts on dermatology-related functional limitations and health-related quality of life (HRQL). This study evaluated the HRQL in Moroccan psoriatics using the Arabic version of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and examined the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. The Moroccan Arabic version of the DLQI was developed and approved by the author of the questionnaire. The DLQI was administered to inpatient and outpatient adult psoriatics. Some participants completed the DLQI for a second time. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Reliability of the DLQI was tested using Cronbach's coefficient alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Factor structure was tested by explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was tested by known-groups comparison using the generalized linear model to assess factors influencing patients' HRQL. A total of 176 psoriatics completed the questionnaire. The mean age was 36 ± 14 years. The mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score was 11.8 ± 7.9. The mean DLQI score was 12.7 ± 5.9 (the higher the score the greater the impairment of HRQL). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.84. ICC was 0.97. The principal component analysis confirmed the bidimensional structure of the questionnaire. Factors associated with poorer HRQL were higher PASI (P < 0.001), pustular and erythrodermal clinical forms (P < 0.001), and older age (P = 0.001). The Arabic version for Morocco of the DLQI is reliable and valid. Severity of the psoriasis, older age, and severe clinical forms influence the HRQL of patients.

ObjectiveMenopause-related symptoms can strongly affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in most peri-menopausal women. The aim of the present study was to explore the psychometric properties of a culturally adapted and translated Persian version of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS).Study DesignThe study was conducted on a random sample of 270 middle-aged women (age range 40–60 yrs) selected from 25 urban health service centers across Tabriz, Iran. Content validity was evaluated by a panel of 11 experts. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analyses with Varimax rotation and principal axis factoring extraction method and by confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. In addition, the feasibility of the measure was judged based on ceiling and floor effects.ResultsContent validity of the measure was good with a mean content validity index (CVI) and mean content validity ratio (CVR) of 0.88 and 0.94, respectively. Exploratory factor analyses identified three factors accounting for 47.69% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analyses found the original three-factor model to have the best fit to the data. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.85) and the test–retest reliability score (0.91) indicated good internal consistency.ConclusionThe Persian version of the MRS demonstrated excellent reliability and validity. It can therefore be used in both clinical and research settings to assess menopause-related symptoms and associated quality of life.

Sensory measurement underlies sensory science. Sensory analysis and decision‐making heavily depend on the quality of sensory data, which is determined by the performance of trained sensory panels and panelists. Various methods have been proposed for monitoring and assessing the performance. A weakness of the currently used methods is lack of a unified framework for various criteria and a variety of experiments with different types of data. This paper proposes to use accuracy, validity and reliability as general terminologies to describe sensory measurement and to apply the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as a framework for monitoring and assessing performance.ICCcan measure both similarity among panelists and sensitivity of panels and panelists. Hence, ICC can handle the problems of both reliability and validity.ICCcan be obtained from different types of data for diverse experiments. This paper provides the equations andRandS‐Plus functions for estimations ofICCs from continuous data (ratings), multivariate continuous data, ordinal data, ranking data, binary‐choice data, multiple‐choice data and forced‐choice data. Confidence intervals, variances of the estimators, comparison with a fixed value and difference and similarity tests for multipleICCs are also provided. The relationship betweenCronbach's coefficient alpha andICCis discussed.Practical ApplicationsIntraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) may play a framework role in monitoring and assessing performance of trained sensory panels and panelists. It can be used as an index of the quality of sensory data. The larger theICCorCronbach's coefficient alpha value, the better the performance of panels and panelists. If and only if anICCis significantly larger than a specified value, can the quality of the data for that attribute be regarded as acceptable. A statistical test that fails to show that anICCorCronbach's coefficient alpha is significantly larger than a specified lowest limit, e.g., 0.1, suggests that the products are undiscriminating, or the sensory data, at least for that attribute, might not be valid and reliable. We should use that data with caution.

Self-care is a key element of hypertension control. This study was carried out with the purpose of translating and investigating the psychometric features of the Persian version of Self-care of Hypertension Inventory Version 3.0 (SC-HI v3.0) in Iranian hypertensive population. This cross-sectional study was carried out in 593 people with hypertension in 2023 in Gonabad city (Iran). The participants were included by stratified random sampling from the community health centers of Gonabad city. The translation of the scale was done according to the multi-stage guideline of the instrument developers. The validity of the SC-HI v3.0 was examined by qualitative face validity, qualitative and quantitative content validity and construct validity assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The reliability of the SC-HI v3.0 was also evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Data analysis was done using Amos software version 24 and SPSS software version 25. In the translation process, face validity, and content validity evaluation, almost all the items of SC-HI v3.0 were partially revised without changing the main concept. In the construct validity evaluation, the results of CFA confirmed the Persian version of SC-HI v3.0 with 21 items and including three scales of maintenance with two factors (7 items), monitoring with one factor (7 items), and management with one factor (7 items). Finally, in reliability evaluation, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and ICC were 0.879 and 0.842, respectively. Considering the lack of a comprehensive and brief tool for measuring hypertension self-care in Iran, the Persian version of the SC-HI v3.0 with 21 items and 3 scales, can be a valid and reliable inventory for self-care evaluation in Iranian hypertensive patients.

Reliability and validity of an objective structured teaching examination for generalist resident teachers.

To develop and investigate the reliability and validity of a Brazilian version of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. A Brazilian version of the questionnaire was developed and applied to patients with chronic eye diseases and healthy controls. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient and interrater reliability coefficient. Participants were submitted to the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Questionnaire. Validity was estimated by the correlation between the questionnaires and among the 12 subscales of the questionnaire, subscales scores and visual acuity, patients' and controls' subscales scores, and the factor analysis. Responsiveness of the questionnaire was assessed in a group of patients before and following cataract surgery. Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation and interrater reliability coefficients were highly significant. Validity was well established in all tests. In patients who underwent cataract surgery, a better vision-related quality of life was observed following surgery. The Brazilian version of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire has valid and reliable psychometric properties and can be applied to vision-related quality of life research.

Psychometric properties of the persian version of the short-form survivor unmet needs survey (SF-SUNS) among patients with cancer

Objective To study the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the dynamic occupational therapy cognitive assessment for children (DOTCA-Ch).Methods The English version of the DOTCA-Ch was translated into Chinese. One hundred and nine students from the city of Jiamusi were assessed with the Chinese Binet intelligence test and the DOTCA-Ch. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used in inter-rater and intra-rater reliability assessments. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to assess internal consistency. Factor analysis was used to assess construct validity. Pearson correlation coefficients were used in assessing criterion-related validity. Results The total ICC of the DOTCA-Ch was 0. 892. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the subtests were orientation 0. 713 ; spatial perception 0. 793 ; praxis 0. 850 ; visuomotor construction 0. 844 and thinking operations 0. 630. The ICC for intra-rater reliability was 0. 991 and for inter-rater reliability it was 0. 989. Using the Binet intelligence test as a benchmark, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the IQ values and the total DOTCA-Ch scores was 0. 872 for 6 year-olds, but 0. 870 for 11 and 12 yearolds. Factor analysis revealed an acceptable set of 5 common factors. Their cumulative contribution was 67％.Conclusions The Chinese version of the DOTCA-Ch is reliable and valid. It can be used as an effective measuring tool to evaluate children's cognitive functioning. Key words: Dynamic occupational therapy cognitive assessment for children ; Binet test of intelligence; Validity; Reliability; China

The aim of this review is to critically appraise and summarize the quality of the measurement properties of all versions of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) version 2.0. The Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale version 2.0 was developed as a comprehensive measure in assessing the quality of life of stroke survivors. The shortened version and cross-culturally translated versions are further developed in different countries. A systematic review will clarify the levels of reliability and validity of all versions. The population of interest for this review will include adult stroke survivors of either sex diagnosed with a stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) who have no other comorbidities affecting their quality of life. The SS-QOL version 2.0 will be the specific instrument of interest, and the quality of life of stroke survivors will be the construct of interest in this review. The measures of reliability, validity, and responsiveness will be assessed as outcomes. Only the studies evaluating the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of all versions of the SS-QOL 2.0 will be included in the review. A literature search will be conducted for published studies in MEDLINE and Embase, and unpublished data in Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. After a three-step search strategy, study selection will be done by two reviewers independently. Then, the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology will be applied for assessment of methodological quality, data extraction, and synthesis. PROSPERO CRD42020211727.

Family health significantly affects society and the country. Health problems have been identified as the most important cause of family anxiety and conflict in South Korea. Because valid instruments to measure this concept are limited, using the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness scale may provide precious insight into family health and nursing practice. This study was designed to translate and validate the Korean version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness (K-ASF-E) scale. This scale was developed based on the framework of systemic organization for assessment and intervention use in the context of family nursing in South Korea. A methodological approach was used to verify the validity and reliability of the K-ASF-E. To determine validity, we first invited four experts to evaluate content validity. Next, we collected data from 1,028 participants using stratified random sampling that considered the background of each participant in terms of region, age, and gender. On the basis of the collected data, we determined the construct validity of the scale using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, we used Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient analyses to assess scale reliability. The K-ASF-E showed item-level content validity index and scale-level content validity index values of 1.00, as assessed by four experts. Using the principal component analysis method with varimax rotation, the exploratory factor analysis verified the validity of a K-ASF-E scale comprising four dimensions and 20 items, including system maintenance (seven items), system change (four items), coherence (six items), and individuation (three items). For confirmatory factor analysis, the fit indices of the factor structure of K-ASF-E indicate appropriate model fitness. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each of the subfactors centered on the target were .59-.86, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (range) was .56-.85. The K-ASF-E scale is the first attempt to develop a reliable and valid measurement tool for family effectiveness in South Korea. Initial testing was validated using a large number of stratified randomized clusters. The K-ASF-E scale accurately measures family effectiveness and may be used for family-related research, intervention, and training programs in community and clinical settings.

BackgroundPatient-centered care is essential for providing quality services thoroughly at the primary care level, but it is unclear and lacks measurement. This study aimed to develop a reliable and valid instrument to measure patient perception of patient-centered care in primary dental care in Thailand and test the measurement invariance between large and small community hospitals.MethodsThe initial set of 45 items for the patient perception of Patient-Centered Care of Dentist Scale (PCCDS-P version) was developed using a mixed-method approach, which included a literature review, a content validity test, cognitive interviews, and a pre-test. A multistage sampling strategy was used to recruit dental patients or their parents or caregivers from community hospitals across Thailand. Validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Furthermore, a multi-group analysis was conducted to compare the responses of patients from large and small community hospitals.ResultsThree hundred thirty-six and One thousand one hundred sixty-seven samples were randomized for EFA and CFA, respectively. The final PCCDS-P version consists of 7 factors with satisfactory reliability and validity and is composed of 42 items: dentist-patient relationship, disease-illness, integrated care, communication, shared information and decision-making, holistic, and empathy and anxiety management. The CFA showed the model fit was consistent with the entire sample. The metric invariance analysis showed that the factor loadings were invariant across patient groups. Overall, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient were satisfactory.ConclusionsThe newly developed PCCDS-P version is composed of seven domains with 42 items with good reliability and validity, and it indicated measurement invariance across patients in large and small community hospitals.

Chinese version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey: Assessment of reliability and validity

BackgroundThis study is to evaluate swallowing problems (dysphasia) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients; the importance of using tools that are durable and appropriate is well understood. One of the most trusted tools is the dysphagia in multiple sclerosis (DYMUS) test. The aim of this study was to prepare a Persian version and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the test.Materials and MethodsThis methodological study was conducted on 236 MS patients in Southeast of Iran from August 2015 to February 2016. After translation and cultural adaptation of the test in Persian, the validity of this test was determined using expert opinions accordance with the International Quality of Life Assessment Project. In addition, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed with varimax rotation. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted and the goodness of fit indices was calculated. Moreover, to test the reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used.Results:In total, 236 MS patients were included in the study (81 males and 155 females). All the questions in the test's Persian version obtained an acceptable face and content validity (content validity ratio = 1, Scale content validity index/Ave = 1). EFA revealed that the scale has two factors (solid–liquid) with 67.5% cumulative variance. CFA indicated a good fit to the intended two-factor structure, and the ratio of Chi-square to the degree of freedom was 1.79, and the root mean square error of approximation was 0.058. The internal consistency of total test indicated the appropriate level (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.775), and test–retest reliability total questionnaire was found to be ICC = 0.985, indicating its high reliability.Conclusion:The results of this study indicated that the Persian version of the DYMUS questionnaire had good reliability and validity for patients with MS.

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: Scale development