Abstract
In this article a double and closely related issues will be addressed. On one hand the academy and many government research projects call for interdisciplinarity, but paradoxically, it is negatively sanctioned as can be seen at present in bio-art’s activities. Philosophy also suffers this penalty because in one of its areas is multidisciplinary and seems to don’t have a proper function while, in another of its aspects, is enclosed in a role of excessive purism. In both cases, and with the thought of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari ( What is Philosophy ?), We note that philosophy is located at the map of academic and general knowledge in a declining place for the two reasons: in one of its activities because it’s flexible and articulating, and in another of them, due to their “tone of distinction” under the paradigm of the sage that make her a court and not an active and productive knowledge. In line with this diagnosis will outline the importance of renaming the category of “contamination” with the thoughts of Deleuze, Guattari and Michel Serres, leading to an area of mixtures between knowledge as a way to actively combat the aforementioned problems or, at least, to unravel aporias crossing the relationship between disciplines and the academy in general with their environment.
Highlights
In this article a double and closely related issues will be addressed
Amanda Núñez García make her a court and not an active and productive knowledge. In line with this diagnosis will outline the importance of renaming the category of “contamination” with the thoughts of Deleuze, Guattari and Michel Serres, leading to an area of mixtures between knowledge as a way to actively combat the aforementioned problems or, at least, to unravel aporias crossing the relationship between disciplines and the academy in general with their environment
Entonces, que parece que las actividades productivas se constituyen en su contaminación propia y recíproca, en la potencia fluida que las atraviesa y que las une entre sí y también con otras épocas como nos hace notar Serres y la filosofía articulando estos cánones con la antigüedad, por ejemplo, de Lucrecio o, como realiza Deleuze, con el pensamiento spinozista o estoico
Summary
Gilles Deleuze y Félix Guattari en su último libro ¿Qué es la filosofía? (1999), se encargan de revisar la imagen de la filosofía imperante y de cómo ha devenido, por su mismo autoreflejo, en una suerte de ensoñación de sí misma inoperante en muchos casos. La propuesta de Deleuze y Guattari, ya en una contaminación entre la filosofía y otras disciplinas y dentro y fuera de la academia (y, en una academia muy particular por nueva y por periférica con es Vincennes) nos parece relacionada con un modo de operar presocrático o helenístico de los saberes. Michel Serres, otra anomalía en este mapa del pensar, lo denomina, las ciencias de Venus (Vid. 1994 Passim); ciencias abiertas al contagio y a una contaminación enriquecedoras y, como no, a veces peligrosas; más que a las llamadas ciencias de Marte o ciencias puristas que pretenden inmunizarse (Vid. Espósito 2005) del contacto con cualquier otra disciplina o método porque son ciencias en pugna y no en procesos conjuntos de co-incidencia
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
