Abstract

While intensifiers are primarily associated with informal spoken registers, they serve important interpersonal functions also in more formal registers like academic prose. The use of intensifiers in scientific writing has accordingly been explored in Present-Day English, and previous studies have also investigated diachronic changes in this register in Middle and Early Modern English. However, the Late Modern English period remains largely unexplored, despite the fact that at least in medical writing it represents an important transition period both intellectually and textually. To follow up on the trends and developments established in previous work, this paper explores the patterns of intensification in eighteenth century medical writing using Late Modern English Medical Texts (LMEMT; Taavitsainen et al. 2019), which contains a large collection of texts representing different areas of medicine. While the intensifiers that are selected for study are ubiquitous in the data, their frequency varies considerably between individual texts, and this variation is often linked to the characteristics of individual sub-registers. At the same time, the use of intensifiers in this period is characterized by stability rather than dramatic change, despite ongoing changes in the sociocultural context of medicine. Along with providing a detailed investigation of the frequency of the main intensifiers in different categories of medical writing of the period, the analysis describes their co-selection patterns with particular adjectives.

Highlights

  • Register has been shown to be an important determinant of variation in the use of intensifiers (Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad & Finegan 1999:564-566)

  • The aim of this paper is to follow up on the trends and developments established in previous work by exploring the patterns of intensification in eighteenth century medical writing, using Late Modern English Medical Texts (LMEMT; Taavitsainen et al 2019), which contains a large collection of texts representing different areas of medicine

  • Given that text categories represent different sub-registers of medical writing, the data presented in Figure 2 can be used to explore whether and to what extent particular intensifiers are associated with specific sub-registers of eighteenth century medical discourse

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Register has been shown to be an important determinant of variation in the use of intensifiers (Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad & Finegan 1999:564-566). This is true of individual historical periods: while scientific and medical writing in Middle and Early Modern English have received attention (Pahta 2006a; Méndez-Naya & Pahta 2010; Hiltunen 2012), the Late Modern English period remains largely unexplored This specific period is interesting from the perspective of sub-register variation, representing an important transition period both intellectually and textually (Taavitsainen et al 2014). The research on intensification in English is broad, including both synchronic and diachronic studies representing various perspectives (e.g., Bolinger 1972; Partington 1993; Lorenz 1999; Ito & Tagliamonte 2003; Tagliamonte & Roberts 2005; MéndezNaya 2008; Zeschel 2012; Breban & Davidse 2016; Tagliamonte 2016; Wagner 2017; Schweinberger 2020) Of these studies, the most relevant to the present study are those focusing on variation and change in intensification constructions. The focus has been on the emergence of new and creative intensifiers (Tagliamonte & Roberts 2005), and linking them to sociolinguistic factors and questions of identity (Tagliamonte 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.