Abstract

The relationship between anthracnose resistance of tomato cultivars and disease incidence at various fungicide application intervals (determined by a weather-based scheduling program) was evaluated in field studies in 1992 and 1993. The resistance of tomato cultivars was indexed relative to the disease response of a standard susceptible cultivar in evaluations conducted in a disease nursery. Five different fungicide application intervals, based on action threshold values determined by the TOM-CAST program (12, 16, 20, 24, or 32 daily severity values), were tested on five tomato cultivars that represented a range of resistance currently available in commercial production. The relationship between application interval and disease incidence was determined by linear regression techniques for each cultivar. The slope of the regression for each cultivar was designated as a TOM-CAST anthracnose coefficient (TAC). TAC values were regressed on resistance indices to estimate optimum fungicide spray intervals for cultivars with different degrees of resistance. Results indicated that, with the TOM-CAST program, resistant cultivars require three to four fewer fungicide applications per year than susceptible cultivars to obtain adequate control of anthracnose. Optimum action threshold values may be increased from current recommendations by at least two-fold for resistant cultivars currently under development

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.