Integrating perspectives on transabdominal intestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease management: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physicians and patients in China.
The awareness, accessibility, and utilization of transabdominal intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management from both physicians' and patients' perspectives remains unclear in China. This nationwide cross-sectional survey aimed to gauge the current utilization of IUS, physician and patient perceptions and knowledge gap in IBD management across China. A structured questionnaire, developed by the China IUS Group, was distributed to 612 physicians (69.8% of gastroenterologists, 28.0% of radiologists) from 38 tertiary hospitals and 1,154 IBD patients. A total of 91.7% of physicians expressed an intention to incorporate IUS into future clinical practice. However, while 69.3% of physicians reported IUS availability at their institutions, its utilization varied widely. Only 16.5% of physicians applied IUS to more than 75% of their IBD patients. Additionally, 27.1% of physicians reported receiving IUS training. Radiologists were more likely than gastroenterologists to consider IUS as a sensitive tool for evaluating treatment efficacy (48.3% vs. 19.4%, P< 0.001), intestinal wall fibrosis (33.7% vs. 27.4%, P< 0.001), intestinal fistula (27.9% vs. 11.2%, P< 0.001), abdominal abscesses (49.4% vs. 28.6%, P< 0.001), and disease severity (30.2% vs. 11.0%, P< 0.001). Patients expressed high satisfaction with IUS (76.1%), yet 39.2% had safety concerns. Despite growing recognition of IUS in China, its wide utilization in IBD management requires further promotion. The notable disparity between gastroenterologists and radiologists regarding IUS underscores the need for targeted, specialty-specific training. Strengthening patient education efforts is essential to further enhance patient acceptance of IUS.
- Research Article
8
- 10.4103/sjg.sjg_531_22
- Mar 3, 2023
- Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
The use of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is emerging. We aim to determine the performance of IUS in the assessment of disease activity in IBD. This is a prospective cross-sectional study of IUS performed on IBD patients in a tertiary centre. IUS parameters including intestinal wall thickness, loss of wall stratification, mesenteric fibrofatty proliferation, and increased vascularity were compared with endoscopic and clinical activity indices. Among the 51 patients, 58.8% were male, with a mean age of 41 years. Fifty-seven percent had underlying ulcerative colitis with mean disease duration of 8.4 years. Against ileocolonoscopy, IUS had a sensitivity of 67% (95% confidence interval (CI): 41-86) for detecting endoscopically active disease. It had high specificity of 97% (95% CI: 82-99) with positive and negative predictive values of 92% and 84%, respectively. Against clinical activity index, IUS had a sensitivity of 70% (95% CI: 35-92) and specificity of 85% (95% CI: 70-94) for detecting moderate to severe disease. Among individual IUS parameters, presence of bowel wall thickening (>3 mm) had the highest sensitivity (72%) for detecting endoscopically active disease. For per-bowel segment analysis, IUS (bowel wall thickening) was able to achieve 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity when examining the transverse colon. IUS has moderate sensitivity with excellent specificity in detecting active disease in IBD. IUS is most sensitive in detecting a disease at transverse colon. IUS can be employed as an adjunct in the assessment of IBD.
- Research Article
- 10.3390/jcm14144817
- Jul 8, 2025
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
Objective: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly valued as a noninvasive tool for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management, offering real-time, radiation-free assessment of bowel wall thickness, vascularity, and complications. While IUS is widely adopted in Europe, data on its use in Turkey is scarce. This study aims to address this gap. Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional survey was conducted targeting 817 adult and 150 pediatric gastroenterologists in Turkey. The survey included 26 structured questions on demographics, familiarity with and use of IUS, and barriers to implementation. Results: A total of 191 gastroenterologists participated in this survey, with 56% being adult gastroenterologists (n = 107) and 44% pediatric gastroenterologists (n = 84). Regarding whether they participated in IUS training, 73% (n = 140) of the 191 respondents stated they had not received training. There were notable differences in how IUS was utilized among gastroenterologists: 29% (n = 31) of adult gastroenterologists performed IUS independently, compared to just 2% (n = 2) of pediatric gastroenterologists (p < 0.001). In total, 63% (n = 67) of adult gastroenterologists and 46% (n = 39) of pediatric gastroenterologists reported not using IUS. Altogether, 94% (n = 179) emphasized the necessity of educational opportunities, and 86% (n = 165) favored national guidelines. Conclusions: Our findings reveal that the current application of IUS in Turkey fails to correspond with its expected advantages in managing IBD. Limited educational opportunities are a major challenge, emphasizing the necessity for coordinated educational programs and national guidelines. The expanded adoption of the IUS might significantly improve Turkey’s management of IBD. What is known: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive, cost-effective, and reliable imaging method increasingly recognized for its utility in diagnosing and monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). What is new: This is the first national survey assessing the awareness, usage patterns, and barriers to the adoption of IUS among gastroenterologists in Turkey. The study highlights significant gaps in training opportunities while also identifying strategies to promote IUS integration into routine clinical practice. The findings may encourage similar efforts in other regions where IUS remains underutilized, ultimately improving IBD management and patient outcomes globally.
- Research Article
- 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac190.0500
- Jan 30, 2023
- Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
P370 Correlation of the IBD Disk with intestinal ultrasound in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
- Research Article
- 10.1093/jcag/gwad061.079
- Feb 14, 2024
- Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Background New tools for evaluating Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) activity and complications are needed to deliver timely disease management and improve patient outcomes. Point of care (POC) intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is safe, inexpensive, and less invasive compared to standard endoscopy and imaging. Aims To evaluate the implementation of POC IUS within an ambulatory IBD clinic at the QEII Health Sciences Center. Methods This was a retrospective evaluation of a cohort of patients who had undergone IUS within the Nova Scotia Collaborative Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Clinic (NSCIBD) between January 18, 2023 and August 13, 2023. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Patient demographics, disease-related characteristics, perceived impact of IUS on need for endoscopy, perceived impact of IUS on IBD management, and clinical utility of IUS were collected. Surveys were administered prospectively to referring care providers and patients following IUS. Patient surveys assessed IUS satisfaction, acceptance of other methods to assess IBD activity, whether IUS improved knowledge of illness, and impact on quality of life (QoL). Results One physician completed 107 IUS exams on 92 patients at the NSCIBD clinic over a nine-month period. Of 92 patients, 47 (51%) were male and 78 (85%) had Crohn’s disease. 53 patients provided an email and consented to survey participation. 34 responses were submitted (64%). There were 97 responses (91%) from 12 referring gastroenterology specialist clinicians. Ninety-three percent of responses show IUS reports were very helpful (60%) or somewhat helpful (33%). More than a third (37%) of IUS exams were reported to delay or prevent the need for endoscopic evaluation, and 34% were reported to prompt a therapeutic change. Of available tools, IUS had the highest proportion of patients who felt it was completely acceptable (77%), compared to colonoscopy (41%), stool sampling (50%), blood tests (71%), and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (47%). Most (89%) indicated IUS caused either no discomfort (68%) or little discomfort (21%), with no patient reporting a lot of discomfort. Some patients (41%) reported that IUS improved their understanding of their illness, and 38% believe it improved their QoL. Conclusions POC IUS offers an accurate, less invasive option for monitoring IBD activity compared to traditional investigations. There is limited data on implementation of, and patient and clinician perspectives regarding use of IUS and its clinical implications. Even early in implementation, POC IUS has clear benefits. This study suggests that IUS is highly acceptable to patients for investigating/monitoring their illness. Treating clinicians find significant value in IUS and report that it can prevent the need for endoscopic evaluation and prompt changes in therapeutic management. Funding Agencies None
- Discussion
1
- 10.1016/j.dld.2020.07.021
- Jul 27, 2020
- Digestive and Liver Disease
Reply to comment: Screening for active COVID-19 infection prior to biologic therapy in IBD patients: primum non nŏcēre
- Research Article
- 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf231.619
- Jan 1, 2026
- Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis
P0438 Making waves: Intestinal Ultrasound in the transition of care of Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients from paediatric to adult care in two centres
- Research Article
- 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0550
- Jan 22, 2025
- Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
P0376 Advancing intestinal ultrasound for IBD in Turkey: results of a national survey
- Research Article
- 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.1547
- Jan 22, 2025
- Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
N15 Why and How To Establish Intestinal Ultrasound in the IBD Nurse Outpatient Clinic
- Research Article
1
- 10.1016/j.coph.2025.102576
- Dec 1, 2025
- Current opinion in pharmacology
Shaping surgical decisions in IBD - Unveiling the power of intestinal ultrasound across the perioperative pathway.
- Abstract
- 10.1093/jcag/gwab002.171
- Mar 4, 2021
- Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant alterations in the ability to deliver outpatient care to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including endoscopic evaluation. This has highlighted the need for alternative, accurate, non-invasive strategies to safely assess disease activity.AimsThe aim of this study is to describe the impact of point of care intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in a university-based tertiary care IBD urgent access clinic.MethodsWe prospectively evaluated a comprehensive care pathway which incorporated outpatient sigmoidoscopy and intestinal ultrasound with the purpose of directing further ambulatory clinical care and avoiding hospitalization or hospital-based investigations including endoscopy during the COVID pandemic for patients with established IBD with symptoms suggestive of a disease flare, or those at high risk of a new diagnosis of IBD. Non-invasive markers C Reactive Protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (fCal) were collected where available. Patients were pre-screened for influenza-like illness, as COVID-19 testing was not available for this population during the study period. Substantial management changes were defined as addition of any medications, biologic switch/ optimization, and or referral for surgical consultation.ResultsBetween March 15th and June 30th 2020, a total of 72 patients were seen in the urgent access clinic. All patients were seen within 7 days of referral. The majority were female 57% (41/72) and/ or had Crohn’s disease 65.5% (47/72) (Table 1). Of these, 84.7% (61/72) underwent a substantial management change based on features of active inflammation detected by either IUS alone (53% 38/72) sigmoidoscopy alone (12.5% 9/72) or combination IUS with in-clinic sigmoidoscopy (32% 23/72) in addition to CRP and fCal. Three new diagnoses of IBD were made: one colonic Crohn’s and 2 with ulcerative colitis. One pregnant patient avoided all acute care utilization. Five patients were referred to colorectal surgery for urgent resection including two patients admitted directly for emergent operations. No patients required visits to the emergency department. Furthermore, there have been no unscheduled hospitalizations occurred in this cohort since inception March 23, 2020 til November 15th 2020.ConclusionsThe implementation of IUS in a centralized, urgent access clinic pathway resulted in efficient and meaningful changes in IBD management while sparing the need for acute care services including ER visits, need for in-hospital endoscopy, and hospitalization. The pandemic highlights the utility of this patient-center tool and supports expansion of wider IUS adoption.Funding AgenciesNone
- Research Article
12
- 10.1093/crocol/otad027
- May 15, 2023
- Crohn's & Colitis 360
BackgroundThere is a clinical need to improve the monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity. Despite being used regularly in European countries, intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has been implemented less in the United States for unclear reasons.AimsThe aim of this study is to illustrate how IUS can be used as a clinical decision-making tool in an American IBD cohort.MethodsThis retrospective cohort analysis evaluated patients with IBD seen at our institution who underwent IUS as part of routine evaluation of their IBD from July 2020 to March 2022. To evaluate the clinical utility of IUS for different patient populations and against more frequently used measures of inflammation, we compared patient demographics, inflammatory markers, clinical scores, and medications between patients in remission and those with active inflammation. Treatment plans between the 2 groups were compared and we analyzed patients with follow-up IUS visits to validate treatment plan decisions at initial evaluation.ResultsOut of 148 total patients with IUS, we found that 62.1% (N = 92) of our patients had active disease and 37.9% (N = 56) were in remission. Ulcerative colitis activity index and Mayo scores were both significantly correlated with IUS findings. The treatment plan was significantly correlated with IUS findings (P = .004). At follow-up, we observed an overall decrease in intestinal thickening, improvements in vascular flow, and mural stratification.ConclusionsClinical decisions incorporating IUS findings effectively reduced inflammation in our IBD patients. IUS should be strongly considered by IBD clinicians in the United States for monitoring disease activity in IBD.
- Research Article
- 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf231.553
- Jan 1, 2026
- Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis
P0372 Access to intestinal ultrasound reshapes diagnostic pathways and healthcare costs in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis: analysis of clinician decision-making at the point of referral
- Discussion
5
- 10.1016/j.dld.2020.05.037
- May 26, 2020
- Digestive and Liver Disease
Screening for active COVID-19 infection prior to biologic therapy in IBD patients: Let's not increase our uncertainty without reducing our concerns
- Research Article
- 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf231.416
- Jan 1, 2026
- Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis
P0235 The IBUS-IBD Scores Calculator: an iOS & Android app to promote and facilitate the use of intestinal ultrasound scores in IBD patients.
- Research Article
7
- 10.5217/ir.2023.00003
- Apr 30, 2023
- Intestinal Research
Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a promising modality for the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and has the potential to particularly contribute in monitoring disease activity, an advantage crucial for optimizing the therapeutic strategy. While many IBD physicians appreciate and are interested in the use of IUS for IBD, currently only a limited number of facilities can employ this examination in daily clinical practice. A lack of guidance is one of the major barriers to introducing this procedure. Standardized protocols and assessment criteria are needed such that IUS for IBD can be considered a feasible, reliable examination in clinical practice, and multicenter clinical studies can be conducted for further clinical evidence of the application of IUS in IBD for best patient care. In this article, we provide an overview of how to start IUS for IBD and introduce basic procedures. Furthermore, IUS images from our practice are provided as a color atlas for understanding sonographic findings and scoring systems. We anticipate this "first aid" article will be helpful to promote IUS for IBD in daily practice.
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.