Abstract
Housing and urban regeneration have moved beyond ‘bricks and mortar’ approaches and now often entail social and economic initiatives. Governments are increasingly retreating from direct involvement in housing and urban regeneration. In many cases, they no longer have the power or the resources to determine the outcomes of housing and urban regeneration decision-making processes. Consequently, more private actors and resources are needed to formulate and deliver housing and urban regeneration policies. Traditional hierarchical steering by the state is replaced by market competition and more interactive, networked forms of governance. This article presents a framework to explore these institutional developments and governance issues and discusses the emergence, the characteristics, and the strengths and weaknesses of governance networks.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
