INNOVATIONS IN DIABETES MELLITUS MANAGEMENT: A REVIEW OF USFDA-APPROVED DRUGS AND PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIALS.

Successful Investigational New Drug Preparation without Reinventing the Wheel

Diabetes mellitus, defined as a fasting plasma glucose of ≥126 mg/dL or a glycosylated hemoglobin A1c level (HbA1c) of ≥6.5%, afflicts ≈12.9% of adults in the United States and nearly 285 million adults worldwide.1,2 Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease, independently conferring a 2-fold excess risk of coronary heart disease and stroke.3 Macrovascular events in diabetes mellitus remain the leading cause of mortality, and the burden of cardiovascular disease attributable to diabetes mellitus has increased over the past decade.4 An increase in the prevalence of obesity has contributed to the rise in diabetes mellitus. Additionally, obesity independently increases the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus.5 Although strict glycemic control unequivocally reduces the microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus, the macrovascular benefits of intensive therapy have been difficult to establish, with conflicting results from large clinical trials.6–9 Multifactorial strategies are recommended to reduce cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus through enhanced glycemic control, blood pressure reduction, lipid management, weight loss, and physical activity.10 Unfortunately, despite aggressive interventions for hyperglycemia, <50% of patients achieve standard HbA1c targets with conventional therapy.11 Polypharmacy is required to achieve glycemic control in the majority of patients within 3 years of diagnosis.12 Although combinations of drug classes can synergistically target multiple pathophysiological defects, novel therapies are required to manage diabetes mellitus and mitigate cardiovascular risks. Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist incretin therapies were developed to complement conventional treatment options for diabetes mellitus. Despite promising initial reports of cardioprotective effects, DPP-IV inhibitors have failed to demonstrate improved cardiovascular outcomes in large clinical trials.13–15 Randomized studies to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists are currently underway. This review presents …

Direct-Acting Antivirals for Chronic Hepatitis C: Can Drug Properties Signal Potential for Liver Injury?

The future of drug safety: What the IOM report may mean to the emergency department

Reporting standards for adverse events after medical device use in the peripheral vascular system

FDA's role in anesthetic drug development.

“Black box” 101: How the Food and Drug Administration evaluates, communicates, and manages drug benefit/risk

Innovation in Health Care: Time for a Gut Check

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death in American women and accounts for a full one-third of all deaths.1 Although the common perception may be that CVD affects mainly men, there is equal prevalence of this disease between the genders by the age of 40, and by the age of 60 more women than men are affected. More women than men have died from CVD causes on a yearly basis since the mid 1980s, and whereas the CVD mortality has steadily declined in men over the past 30 years, it has remained steady in women until very recently when CVD mortality was noted to decrease for both genders.2 See accompanying article on page 277 The impact of cardiovascular disease (CVD) on the health status of American women is gaining more recognition and has become the focus of public education efforts such as the “Go Red for Women” campaign sponsored by the American Heart Association and the “Red Dress” project sponsored by the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). These programs are, in part, a response to the increasing awareness of cardiovascular disease as a major source of morbidity and mortality in U.S. women. The importance of CVD as a major source of mortality in women was recognized early on by federally funded institutes including the Public Health Service Task Force, which brought attention to concerns about the health information available to women and the historical lack of research focus on women’s health in its 1985 Report of the Public Health Service Task Force on Women’s Health Issues .3 In response to this report, the National Institutes of Health adopted a policy for the inclusion of women in clinical research …

Diversity and Inclusion in Pancreatic Cancer Clinical Trials

Defining Endpoints and Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Moving the Needle Through Clinical Trial Design

Access to data from clinical trials in the COVID-19 crisis: open, flexible, and time-sensitive

Old Drugs, New Concerns

Weighing the benefits and risks of diabetes drugs: a call for a unified global approach.

Recommendations from national regulatory agencies for ongoing cancer trials during the COVID-19 pandemic