Abstract
AbstractBackgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) may occur due to several forms of neurodegenerative diseases and non‐degenerative conditions and is associated with cognitive impairment that does not affect everyday activities. For a timely diagnosis of MCI to prevent progression to dementia, a screening tool of fast, low‐cost and easy access is needed. Recent research on eye movement hints it a potential application for the MCI screening. However, the precise extent of cognitive function decline and eye‐movement control alterations in patients with MCI is still unclear.MethodPatients with MCI (n = 79) and age‐matched cognitively healthy controls (HC) (n = 170) completed four saccadic eye‐movement paradigms: prosaccade (PS)/antisaccade (AS), Go/No‐go, and a battery of neuropsychological tests.ResultThe findings revealed significantly longer latency in patients with MCI than in HC during the PS task. Additionally, patients with MCI had a lower proportion of correct responses and a marked increase in inhibition errors for both PS/AS and Go/No‐go tasks. Furthermore, when patients with MCI made errors, they failed to self‐correct many of these inhibition errors. In addition to the increase in inhibition errors and uncorrected inhibition errors, patients with MCI demonstrated a trend toward increased correction latencies. We also showed a relationship between neuropsychological scores and correct and error saccade responses.ConclusionOur results demonstrate that, similar to patients with Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), patients with MCI generate a high proportion of erroneous saccades toward the prepotent target and fail to self‐correct many of these errors, which is consistent with an impairment of inhibitory control and error monitoring.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.