Abstract
To understand the functional connectivity of neural networks, it is important to develop simple and incisive descriptors of multineuronal firing patterns. Analysis at the pairwise level has proven to be a powerful approach in the retina, but it may not suffice to understand complex cortical networks. Here we address the problem of describing interactions among triplets of neurons. We consider two approaches: an information-geometric measure (Amari 2001), which we call the "strain," and the Kullback-Leibler divergence. While both approaches can be used to assess whether firing patterns differ from those predicted by a pairwise maximum-entropy model, the strain provides additional information. Specifically, when the observed firing patterns differ from those predicted by a pairwise model, the strain indicates the nature of this difference--whether there is an excess or a deficit of synchrony--while the Kullback-Leibler divergence only indicates the magnitude of the difference. We show that the strain has technical advantages, including ease of calculation of confidence bounds and bias, and robustness to the kinds of spike-sorting errors associated with tetrode recordings. We demonstrate the biological importance of these points via an analysis of multineuronal firing patterns in primary visual cortex. There is a striking scale-dependent behavior of triplet firing patterns: deviations from the pairwise model are substantial when the neurons are within 300 microns of each other, and negligible when they are at a distance of >600 microns. The strain identifies a consistent pattern to these interactions: when triplet interactions are present, the strain is nearly always negative, indicating that there is less synchrony than would be expected from the pairwise interactions alone.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Pairwise Model
Firing Patterns
Pairwise Maximum-entropy Model
Kullback-Leibler Divergence
Information-geometric Measure
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
PLOS Computational Biology
Oct 2, 2017
Nature Communications
Jan 22, 2013
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Mar 1, 2013
Feb 16, 2021
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Jan 1, 2009
Langmuir
Apr 5, 2018
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Aug 8, 2023
Mar 18, 2017
eLife
Mar 28, 2017
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Jan 1, 2014
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Nov 1, 2014
Neuron
Mar 1, 2008
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Jul 26, 2010
PLoS Computational Biology
May 8, 2009
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
Jul 5, 2023
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
Jun 26, 2023
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
May 17, 2023
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
May 6, 2023
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
May 1, 2023
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
Apr 17, 2023
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
Apr 14, 2023
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
Dec 21, 2022
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
Dec 16, 2022
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
Nov 12, 2022