Influence of heat from light curing units and dental composite polymerization on cells in vitro

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the use of a light curing unit (LCU) with high light power would result in a higher temperature and therefore a statistically significant lower number of living human gingiva fibroblasts within a pulp chamber model than the use of a light emitting diode (LED) LCU. Materials and methods The composites Admira, Grandio, Filtek Supreme and Filtek Z250 were polymerized with the LCUs Swiss Master Light, Optilux 501 and an LED LCU prototype in a mould on top of a pulp chamber model. The temperature was recorded within the pulp chamber with a thermocouple. The cytotoxicity of the polymerized samples was tested by using the MTT test. Results In general there was no considerable difference in the temperature increase within the pulp chamber model for the different LCUs and composites. There was no statistically significant difference in the cell number (P=0.3767) when the different LCUs were used. Conclusion Using a high power halogen LCU for a short time or a standard halogen or LED LCU for a longer time did not result in a considerable difference in the temperature increase or the number of living cells within a pulp chamber model. This study indicates not only that the temperature may have an effect on the living cells, but also that cells may be negatively affected by the unpolymerized composite or light of the LCUs.—Reprinted with permission of Elsevier Publishing. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the use of a light curing unit (LCU) with high light power would result in a higher temperature and therefore a statistically significant lower number of living human gingiva fibroblasts within a pulp chamber model than the use of a light emitting diode (LED) LCU. The composites Admira, Grandio, Filtek Supreme and Filtek Z250 were polymerized with the LCUs Swiss Master Light, Optilux 501 and an LED LCU prototype in a mould on top of a pulp chamber model. The temperature was recorded within the pulp chamber with a thermocouple. The cytotoxicity of the polymerized samples was tested by using the MTT test. In general there was no considerable difference in the temperature increase within the pulp chamber model for the different LCUs and composites. There was no statistically significant difference in the cell number (P=0.3767) when the different LCUs were used. Using a high power halogen LCU for a short time or a standard halogen or LED LCU for a longer time did not result in a considerable difference in the temperature increase or the number of living cells within a pulp chamber model. This study indicates not only that the temperature may have an effect on the living cells, but also that cells may be negatively affected by the unpolymerized composite or light of the LCUs.—Reprinted with permission of Elsevier Publishing.