Abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the influence of adding a second wavelength peak (400 nm) to a light-emitting diode (LED) unit on the degree of conversion (DC) of two commercial orthodontic composites, as well as comparing the DC of those two composites. MethodsTransbond XT and Opal Bond MV were the composites used for the tests, cured either with second- or third-generation LED units adjusted to produce the same power density on a given time. Analysis of DC was performed by using the Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy in four groups of 5 specimens each divided according to the composites and LED curing units being used. The results, which were normally distributed, were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA test. ResultsThe composites showed very similar degrees of conversion when light-cured with second-generation (74.3%) and third-generation (73.2%) LED light-curing units. The Opal Bond MV composite had a higher degree of conversion (81.9%) than the Transbond XT composite (65.7%). No interaction was found (P = 0.56) between the composites and the LED curing units, regardless of their wavelength, on the degree of conversion. ConclusionThere was no influence of either a second- or third-generation LED curing unit on orthodontic composites.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
