Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the influence of cortical thickness and bone density on the insertion torque of a mini-implant (MI) with microthreads. Mini-implants with lengths of 6 and 8 mm in the active part were inserted into synthetic bone blocks (polyurethane resin). The density of these blocks was 20 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), simulating bone marrow, and that of blocks 1, 2, and 3-mm-thick blocks was 40 pcf, simulating cortical bone. Blocks with uniform density of 40 pcf were also used to simulate bone areas of greater density. Insertion torque was quantified with a universal testing machine (EMIC). For both MIs, increasing insertion torque was associated with increasing cortical bone thickness. For the same MI length, significant differences were observed among all assessed groups. The insertion torque of the 6-mm-long MI inserted in a 3-mm-thick cortical bone was equivalent to that of the 8-mm-long MI inserted in a 1-mm-thick cortical bone. MIs inserted in bone blocks of greater density presented insertion torque values almost twice as high as those in other groups. The shorter MI, the lower the insertion torque, and the greater the cortical bone thickness, the greater the insertion torque. To minimize fracture risk, the size of MI should be selected according to the insertion site.
Highlights
Obtaining satisfactory clinical results in orthodontic treatment requires adequate mechanical control, which includes anchorage control
Insertion torque increased with increasing cortical bone thickness when either MI was used
For the same MI length, significant differences were observed among all groups assessed
Summary
Obtaining satisfactory clinical results in orthodontic treatment requires adequate mechanical control, which includes anchorage control. This is true in cases where the space obtained after tooth extraction must be used to align or reposition the teeth; in such cases anchorage control becomes fundamental for orthodontic success. Tooth-supported anchorage resources have the inconvenient consequence of producing collateral effects on the supporting teeth. The use of a stable anchorage unit that is independent of cooperation and has no side effects on adjacent teeth has been studied in recent years[1] through the use of conventional implants, miniplates, or mini-implants (MIs).[2,3,4].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.