Abstract

Dynamical system theory has recently shown promise for uncovering causality and directionality in complex systems, particularly using the method of convergent cross mapping (CCM). In spite of its success in the literature, the presence of process noise raises concern about CCM's ability to uncover coupling direction. Furthermore, CCM's capacity to detect indirect causal links may be challenged in simulated unidrectionally coupled Rossler-Lorenz systems. To overcome these limitations, we propose a method that places a Gaussian process prior on a cross mapping function (named GP-CCM) to impose constraints on local state space neighborhood comparisons. Bayesian posterior likelihood and evidence ratio tests, as well as surrogate data analyses are performed to obtain a robust statistic for dynamical coupling directionality. We demonstrate GP-CCM's performance with respect to CCM in synthetic data simulation as well as in empirical electroencephelography (EEG) and functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) activity data. Our findings show that GP-CCM provides a statistic that consistently reports indirect causal structures in non-separable unidirectional system interactions; GP-CCM also provides coupling direction estimates in noisy physiological signals, showing that EEG likely causes, i.e., drives, fNIRS dynamics.

Highlights

  • Coupling statistics are crucial for describing the relationship between dynamical systems observed in physical data

  • We have introduced a methodology for inferring causality in dynamical systems through Gaussian process theory

  • Leveraging both the concept of cross-mapping onto state spaces and zero mean Gaussian process priors on functional spaces to create a Bayesian model evidence comparison between the causal strength computed separately along the directions X → Y and Y → X, we have developed a robust metric for inferring coupling direction in noisy dynamical systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coupling statistics are crucial for describing the relationship between dynamical systems observed in physical data. Many traditional coupling estimation methods, such as correlation or mutual information measures, are by mathematical definition pairwise analysis of samples [1], encode no inherent causal temporal structure. While these measures have been prevalently used—for example, functional connectivity analysis of high dimensional spatial data [1,2,3]—they neglect to account for the dynamical structure of a time series, and related causal graphs can make no reference to directionality [2]. Among the coupling methods handling the dynamical structure of time series data, Granger causality is widely used [4]. In the framework of stochastic processes, the usage of the probabilistic notion underlying Granger causality increased even more with the introduction of its nonparametric counterpart, transfer entropy [7], which

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.