Abstract
Recognizing the crucial role of mechanical regulation and forces in tissue development and homeostasis has stirred a demand for in situ measurement of forces and stresses. Among emerging techniques, the use of cell geometry to infer cell junction tensions, cell pressures and tissue stress has gained popularity owing to the development of computational analyses. This approach is non-destructive and fast, and statistically validated based on comparisons with other techniques. However, its qualitative and quantitative limitations, in theory as well as in practice, should be examined with care. In this Primer, we summarize the underlying principles and assumptions behind stress inference, discuss its validity criteria and provide guidance to help beginners make the appropriate choice of its variants. We extend our discussion from two-dimensional stress inference to three dimensional, using the early mouse embryo as an example, and list a few possible extensions. We hope to make stress inference more accessible to the scientific community and trigger a broader interest in using this technique to study mechanics in development.
Highlights
The roles of mechanical interactions during morphogenesis, proposed more than one century ago (His, 1874; Thompson, 1917; Dupont, 2017), are well recognized
Forces and stresses contribute to the determination of static cell shapes and packing (Graner and Riveline, 2017), as well as dynamic changes in cell size, shape, number and position, and gene expression, all of which contribute to tissue morphogenesis
We present a case study for 3D stress inference on preimplantation mouse embryos and compare the findings with tension measurements using micropipette aspiration
Summary
The roles of mechanical interactions during morphogenesis, proposed more than one century ago (His, 1874; Thompson, 1917; Dupont, 2017), are well recognized. Forces and stresses contribute to the determination of static cell shapes and packing (Graner and Riveline, 2017), as well as dynamic changes in cell size, shape, number and position, and gene expression, all of which contribute to tissue morphogenesis (reviewed by Heisenberg and Bellaïche, 2013; Heer and Martin, 2017). Tissue morphogenesis and mechanics can impact cell-fate specification (Gjorevski and Nelson, 2010; Mammoto et al, 2012; Chan et al, 2017). Such combined control by genetics and mechanics, and their feedback, helps to ensure that tissue
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.