Abstract
In the Classical period, the Erechtheion and the Parthenon were constructed opposite each other on the Acropolis of Athens. If the Parthenon represents perfection, what can be said of the Erechtheion? We are familiar with the idea that the perceived perfection of monuments such as the Parthenon is due in large measure to their proportional systems. Can such a system possibly be at work in the Erechtheion, a structure that otherwise seems the antithesis of the compositionally simple, perfectly pure Parthenon? Asymmetrical buildings closely configured to elaborate programmatic requirements are the norm in contemporary architecture, yet the Erechtheion continues to seem idiosyncratic, and the intentions of its designers obscure. Yet the exquisite beauty of its carving has always promised more. This paper will show that the Erechtheion does indeed follow a rigorous proportional scheme that is consistent down to its smallest details and which is located firmly within a Greek tradition as passed on to us by Vitruvius. The proportional apparatus of ancient Greek architecture, most often interpreted as relationships of rational numbers, will be shown to control the design of the Erechtheion through the rational approximations of irrational numbers as described by ancient authors. Keywords: Erechtheion, Vitruvius, Ionic order, irrational numbers, square root of two
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.