Abstract

In 2006 Carbery raised a question about an improvement on the naïve norm inequality Vert f+gVert _p^p le 2^{p-1}(Vert fVert _p^p + Vert gVert _p^p) for two functions f and g in L^p of any measure space. When f=g this is an equality, but when the supports of f and g are disjoint the factor 2^{p-1} is not needed. Carbery’s question concerns a proposed interpolation between the two situations for p>2 with the interpolation parameter measuring the overlap being Vert fgVert _{p/2}. Carbery proved that his proposed inequality holds in a special case. Here, we prove the inequality for all functions and, in fact, we prove an inequality of this type that is stronger than the one Carbery proposed. Moreover, our stronger inequalities are valid for all real pne 0.

Highlights

  • Introduction and Main Theorem1.1 Main ResultSince |z|p is a convex function of z for p ≥ 1, for any measure space, the L p unit ball, { f : | f |p ≤ 1}, is convex

  • (1.1) is equivalent to Minkowski’s inequality, it becomes an equality in fewer circumstances

  • There is another well-known refinement of Minkowski’s inequality for 1 < p < ∞, namely Hanner’s inequality, [2,6,9] which gives the exact modulus of convexity of the unit ball in L p, Bp := { f : | f |p ≤ 1}

Read more

Summary

Main Result

Since |z|p is a convex function of z for p ≥ 1, for any measure space, the L p unit ball, { f : | f |p ≤ 1}, is convex. We note that Carbery’s proposed inequality (1.2) involves three kinds of quantities on the right side (namely, f g p/2, f g p p and f p g p), while our inequality (1.4) involves only two (namely, f g p/2 and f g pp) This both strengthens the result and simplifies the proof. Carbery proved that his proposed inequality (1.2) is valid when f and g are characteristic functions. Another important special case is when f and g are proportional to each other Even in this special case, inequality (1.4) is quite nontrivial and, constitutes the core of the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Outline of Our Proof
Relation to Other Convexity Inequalities
Part A
Part B
Proof of the Inequality
Doubling Arguments
A Generalization to Schatten Norms
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.