Abstract

Individual differences in hearing ability might be dominated by subcomponents of hearing loss, e.g., cochlear gain loss, cochlear neuropathy, temporal coding deficits in low/high frequency regions, or combinations of these components. Unfortunately, we can only rely on indirect and hypothesis-driven objective (e.g., OAE/ABR/EFR) and psychoacoustic threshold metrics that aim to quantify these subcomponents of hearing loss, complicating a straightforward explanation of study results. Because correlations statistics often rely on small listener groups in which each data point could have resulted from different SNRs, metric-specific variability, it is not always clear which correlations are significant and meaningful. Additionally, multiple measures provide a multitude of correlations that should all support the common underlying hypothesis before conclusions can be drawn. In this tutorial, I provide some examples and approaches to more (and less) meaningful correlations based on recently collected objective and psychoacoustic measures in a group of normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Finally, I will introduce how computational model approaches might direct the interpretation of experimental results when several interacting sources of hearing impairment impact outcome measures unexpectedly.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.