Abstract

Managing the risks of climate variability on crop production is central to ensuring financially viable farming systems and sustainable food production. Insurance provides a mechanism to manage and transfer climate risks. However, traditional multi-peril crop insurance (MCPI) is often too expensive and so other methods, such as index insurance, are being explored as a cheaper way to insure farmers against climate induced crop losses. Here we investigate the potential financial benefits of index insurance (protecting against excessive rainfall) for agricultural producers, namely sugar cane farmers in Tully, northern Australia. We used 80 years of historical climate and yield data to develop an excessive rainfall index. The index was developed and tested using generalized additive regression models (allowing for non-linear effects) and quantile regression, which allows relationships with lower quantiles (i.e. low yield events) to be assessed. From the regression models we derived relationships between the excessive rainfall index and sugar cane yield losses that were converted to insurance fair premiums (i.e. premiums that cover expected losses). Finally, we used efficiency analysis, based on Conditional Tail Expectation (CTE), Certainty Equivalence of Revenue (CER) and Mean Root Square Loss (MRSL), to quantify financial benefits to farmers if they purchased excessive rainfall index insurance. The regression model predicted sugar cane yields well (cross-validated R2 of 0.65). The efficiency analysis indicated there could be financial benefit to sugar cane farmers if they were to use excessive rainfall index insurance. Index insurance (based on the assumption of a fair premium) could make farmers better off by $269.85 AUD/ha on average in years with excessive rainfall (i.e. years with rainfall over the 95th percentile). Index insurance could offer a viable method for managing the financial risks posed by excessive rainfall for sugar cane producers in northern Australia. We are not aware of any other study demonstrating the potential benefits of excessive rainfall index insurance in the literature, but our results suggest this type of insurance may be viable for sugar cane producers, and other crops, in parts of the world where extreme rainfall poses a risk to the financial sustainability of production.

Highlights

  • Climate variability is a key cause of crop losses and accounts for a third of the variation in crop yields globally (Ray et al, 2015)

  • Our results suggest that excessive rainfall index insurance could provide an important means for helping producers manage their climate risk in areas where excessive rainfall causes production losses

  • We are aware of no analysis on index insurance to protect against sugar cane yield loss caused by excessive rainfall for south-east Asia, but our results suggest that excessive rainfall index insurance could provide a means to manage climate risks for production in these areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate variability is a key cause of crop losses and accounts for a third of the variation in crop yields globally (Ray et al, 2015). Additional to threatening food security, crop yield losses from extreme climate variability undermine the financial sustainability of agricultural production (Odening and Shen, 2014). In areas without subsidies the prohibitive costs of MPCI mean that farmers rarely purchase this type of insurance and remain exposed to significant climate risks (Odening and Shen, 2014). Given that climate extreme events that decrease yields are expected to become more prevalent under climate change it is becoming more important for farmers to proactively manage climate risks (Shannon and Motha, 2015).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.