Abstract

BackgroundVaccines against HPV16/18 are approved for use in females and males but most countries currently have female-only programs. Cultural and geographic factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake might also influence sexual partner choice; this might impact post-vaccination outcomes. Our aims were to examine the population-level impact of adding males to HPV vaccination programs if factors influencing vaccine uptake also influence partner choice, and additionally to quantify how this changes the post-vaccination distribution of disease between subgroups, using incident infections as the outcome measure.MethodsA dynamic model simulated vaccination of pre-adolescents in two scenarios: 1) vaccine uptake was correlated with factors which also affect sexual partner choice (“correlated”); 2) vaccine uptake was unrelated to these factors (“unrelated”). Coverage and degree of heterogeneity in uptake were informed by observed data from Australia and the USA. Population impact was examined via the effect on incident HPV16 infections. The rate ratio for post-vaccination incident HPV16 in the lowest compared to the highest coverage subgroup (RRL) was calculated to quantify between-group differences in outcomes.ResultsThe population-level incremental impact of adding males was lower if vaccine uptake was “correlated”, however the difference in population-level impact was extremely small (<1%) in the Australia and USA scenarios, even under the conservative and extreme assumption that subgroups according to coverage did not mix at all sexually. At the subgroup level, “correlated” female-only vaccination resulted in RRL = 1.9 (Australia) and 1.5 (USA) in females, and RRL = 1.5 and 1.3 in males. “Correlated” both-sex vaccination increased RRL to 4.2 and 2.1 in females and 3.9 and 2.0 in males in the Australia and USA scenarios respectively.ConclusionsThe population-level incremental impact of male vaccination is unlikely to be substantially impacted by feasible levels of heterogeneity in uptake. However, these findings emphasize the continuing importance of prioritizing high coverage across all groups in HPV vaccination programs in terms of achieving equality of outcomes.

Highlights

  • Vaccination of pre-adolescent females against human papillomavirus (HPV) has been recommended or included in publicly funded programs in many developed countries

  • Previous modelling studies have shown that the incremental impact of vaccinating males depends on uptake in females, with the incremental benefit decreasing with increasing female coverage [6,7,8], and that increasing coverage further in females can be more effective and costeffective than including males in vaccination programs [8,9,10]

  • Indirect protection plays an important role in the incremental effectiveness of male vaccination compared to femaleonly programs, because as female coverage increases, so too does indirect protection for males and unvaccinated females; the extent to which vaccinating males can offer additional protection becomes progressively smaller

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vaccination of pre-adolescent females against human papillomavirus (HPV) has been recommended or included in publicly funded programs in many developed countries. The large majority of modelling studies have assumed that choice of sexual partner and sexual behavior are not correlated with vaccination uptake – that is, that any factors which may be associated with vaccine uptake are not associated with aspects of sexual behavior This assumption is unlikely to hold in practice since sociodemographic, cultural and geographic factors are all likely to have a substantial bearing on both sexual partner choice and vaccination uptake in some settings. Our aims were to examine the population-level impact of adding males to HPV vaccination programs if factors influencing vaccine uptake influence partner choice, and to quantify how this changes the post-vaccination distribution of disease between subgroups, using incident infections as the outcome measure

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.