Increasing social and psychological information conveyed to General Practitioners after bad news consultations by use of separate letters from the Lung Cancer Nurse Specialist

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Multidisciplinary teams (MDT) now review all cases of lung cancer. These teams include a Lung Cancer Nurse Specialist (LCNS). These Nurses help support the patient and should facilitate communication and liaise with other services. The LCNS is present when the diagnosis is given to the patient but also usually spends time afterwards with the patient and their family. We postulated that a separate letter from the LCNS to the General Practitioner (GP) after the consultations would convey extra information to the GP. In 58 new lung cancer patients reviewed in the clinic, the LCNS and Physician independently wrote separate letters after the consultation in which the diagnosis of lung cancer was given. The GPs were asked by questionnaire about the usefulness of the letter from the LCNS. This letter was considered by the GP to provide extra information in: (i) 69% concerning the patients reaction to the diagnosis; (ii) 85% concerning who attended the clinic with the patient; (iii) 85% about what referrals were made to community services; (iv) 86% about who the patient was living with; (v) 81% about who the patients carers were; (vi) 81% information on the patients condition; (vii) 70% concerning the information given to patients about benefits. Ninety-seven percent of the GPs found the LCNS letter useful or very useful and 92% of the GPs thought that the information in the letter would be useful or very useful when they next saw the patient. Separate and independent letters from the LCNS after “bad news” consultation in lung cancer provides added useful information for GPs. Ninety-one percent of the GPs wanted the letters from the LCNS to continue.