Abstract
Increasing returns to scale (IRS) phenomena are widely present in economies, and integrated assessment models (IAMs) for climate change generally assume constant returns to scale (CRS). This paper studies the connection between IRS in energy-intensive sectors and the regions' attitude towards climate change. In a model of detrimental (negative) externality, we proved that if some agents' activities related to externality generation exhibit IRS, their optimal target in the efficient externality provision can be very close to their inefficient non-cooperative Cournot-Nash equilibrium position. The numerical simulations in this paper confirm the analytical conclusion. The analytical results point out the potential biases of IAMs under the CRS assumption and provide a better explanation of difficulties in international climate negotiations. Finally, the paper offers some policy suggestions on climate negotiation in the presence of IRS.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
